Teams

PRC - Chase

2025 B'ham Fall - Adult 70 & Over Weekday · 3.0 Women - Monday

13 players · average NTRP 2.79 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-10vs TRC - Brunson/SealeWon 20
W#1 DoublesJimmie King / Katherine Willett vs Betsy Acken / Kathy Seale6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMildred Barnes / Karen Doyal vs Carol Edwards / Belinda Waldo7-5, 6-4
2025-11-24vs PRC - English/WatfordWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeatrice Strickland / Katherine Willett vs Nikki Christopher / Gaile Randall4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJimmie King / Carole Chomicz vs Jan Poe / Nancy English7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmanda Certain / Karen Doyal vs Patti Rozelle / Carleen Morin7-5, 6-2
2025-11-03vs PRC - English/WatfordLost 12
W#1 DoublesJimmie King / Ann Swanson vs Gayle Leal / Carol Rutherford6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarole Chomicz / Karen Doyal vs Nancy English / Nikki Christopher6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlice Chase / Sally Penfield vs Dianne Foster / Inez Sawyer0-6, 2-6
2025-10-20vs TRC - Brunson/SealeLost 03
L#1 DoublesBecky Gibson / Ann Swanson vs Jeanne Jowell / Debbie Nesmith2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Certain / Rebecca Richardson vs Kathy Seale / Karen Duncan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlice Chase / Mildred Barnes vs Carol Edwards / Belinda Waldo5-7, 3-6
2025-10-13vs PRC - English/WatfordWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Gibson / Katherine Willett vs Jan Poe / Nancy English7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarole Chomicz / Jimmie King vs Ella Ruth Stewart / Marie Watford3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeverley Conner / Karen Doyal vs Gaile Randall / Gayle Leal3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-29vs TRC - Brunson/SealeLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Swanson / Beatrice Strickland vs Kathy Seale / Karen Duncan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarole Chomicz / Jimmie King vs Lea Brunson / Jeanne Jowell1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlice Chase / Mildred Barnes vs Betty Howell / Carol Edwards6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-22vs PRC - English/WatfordLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Willett / Ann Swanson vs Dianne Foster / Nikki Christopher4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBecky Gibson / Amanda Certain vs Gayle Leal / Carol Rutherford6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlice Chase / Sally Penfield vs Jan Poe / Inez Sawyer1-6, 2-6
2025-09-08vs TRC - Brunson/SealeLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeatrice Strickland / Becky Gibson vs Barbara Snider / Betty Howell5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJimmie King / Karen Doyal vs Karen Duncan / Debbie Nesmith6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Richardson / Beverley Conner vs Carol Edwards / Sherri McKendree2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Jimmie King
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Becky Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Amanda Certain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Katherine Willett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Beatrice Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Karen Doyal
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Mildred Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Ann Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.32
Carole Chomicz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.08
Alice Chase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.08
Beverley Conner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Renee Saul
published
Sally Penfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Willett + Becky Gibson4163% games+11.5% vs expected
Carole Chomicz + Jimmie King2353% games+8.8% vs expected
Mildred Barnes + Karen Doyal6354% games+6.8% vs expected
Becky Gibson + Ann Swanson1436% games+2.3% vs expected
Ann Swanson + Jimmie King3745% games+1.6% vs expected
Karen Doyal + Beatrice Strickland2447% games−5.3% vs expected
Beatrice Strickland + Amanda Certain1438% games−6.8% vs expected
Ann Swanson + Beatrice Strickland2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jimmie King
15W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Becky Gibson
9W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Amanda Certain
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Katherine Willett
21W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Beatrice Strickland
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Karen Doyal
16W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Mildred Barnes
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Ann Swanson
7W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
2.5
Carole Chomicz
12W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Alice Chase
1W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Beverley Conner
1W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Renee Saul
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Penfield
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.