Teams

Mashburn, Janet

2026 Adult 65 & Over-JXN · Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Walley, Linda000000
2Mashburn, Janet000000
3Bell, Caren000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Debra Baker
published 3
2.76
Roberlyn Searcy
published
Debbie Glorioso
published 3
2.65
Diane Hartman
published 3
Janet Mashburn
published
Kathie Hall
published
Sue Chisolm
published
Susan Beckham
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debra Baker
10W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Roberlyn Searcy
29W–29L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Debbie Glorioso
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Diane Hartman
9W–24L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
2.65
Janet Mashburn
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathie Hall
6W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sue Chisolm
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Beckham
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.