Teams

Broward/Veltri - Gonzalez/Contreras

2022 Broward Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-01vs Midtown - BolinWon 20
W#1 DoublesYulia Childs / Jaimi Hinkle vs Stacy Havens / Maria Alejandra Nunez6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSara Contreras / NING YAN vs Ledaliz Collazo / Giuliana Zunino-Ribas7-5, 6-3
2022-03-07vs Wtc - HawkinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJaimi Hinkle / Yulia Childs vs Lory Strickland / Maria Valeria Yandet3-6, 1-6
2022-02-28vs Midtown - MontserratWon 20
W#1 DoublesYulia Childs / Jaimi Hinkle vs Adriana Montserrat / Sima Sadoughi7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJiaqing McGraw / NING YAN vs Allison Kava / Maria Garcia6-4, 7-6
2022-02-14vs WTc - SanabriaWon 20
W#1 DoublesNING YAN / Jiaqing McGraw vs Sarah Nielsen / Jocelyn Jane6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesYulia Childs / Jaimi Hinkle vs Maria Riccobono / Maggie Oriol6-2, 6-3
2022-02-07vs Dillon - McKeeWon 10
W#1 DoublesNING YAN / Jiaqing McGraw vs Susan Dato / Jessica Withum6-0, 6-0
2022-01-24vs Midtown - MontserratSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNING YAN / Jiaqing McGraw vs Adriana Montserrat / Sima Sadoughi4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJaimi Hinkle / Yulia Childs vs Lisa Carbonell / Juan Yang6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-19vs Midtown - BolinWon 20
W#1 DoublesNING YAN / Jiaqing McGraw vs Kathleen Mason / Marioly Fiandor6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSara Contreras / Yulia Childs vs Ledaliz Collazo / Shamena Khan6-4, 7-6
2022-01-10vs WTc - SanabriaWon 20
W#1 DoublesNING YAN / Jiaqing McGraw vs Angelica QUINTERO / Yolanda Reyes-Retana6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJaimi Hinkle / Yulia Childs vs CAROLINA SANABRIA / Marieliez Ramirez6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Lyana Blokhina
published
3.57
Sandy Shapiro
published
3.46
NING YAN
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.16
Jaimi Hinkle
published 3.5
2.85
Yulia Childs
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Gloria Marquez
published 3
2.53
Sara Contreras
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lyana Blokhina
14W–18L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Sandy Shapiro
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
NING YAN
108W–75L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Jaimi Hinkle
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Yulia Childs
78W–45L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Gloria Marquez
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Sara Contreras
20W–28L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.