Teams

Oxford Mill (Brian Coyle)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Men - Regular Levels · 5.0 Men (Rey Corpuz)

17 players · average NTRP 5.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-14vs Fullers Park (Miguel Este)*Split 22
W#1 DoublesMatthew Cozad / Andrew Felsenthal vs Miguel Este / Erick Bermudez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Stanescu / Xavier Pineda Botey vs Jacob Eastwood / Aidan Coleman3-6, 6-4, 4-6
L#2 SinglesIker Alonso vs James Kober3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNeeru Jayanthi / Rob Merrill vs Douglas Gallagher / Howard Huang6-2, 7-6
2026-01-21vs Fullers Park (Miguel Este)*Won 40
W#1 DoublesDanny Klein / Eddie Gonzalez vs Owen Stice / Benjamin van Hout6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRob Merrill / Campbell Harmon vs Howard Huang / Enoch Leung6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJames Kober vs Stephen Clemons6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLiam Villante / Joseph Castillo vs Douglas Gallagher / Danny Miron6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-13vs Terrell Mill (Will George)*Lost 04
L#1 DoublesNeeru Jayanthi / Paul Stanescu vs David Brown / William McWhirt2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNathaniel Estes vs Austin Bass4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Lahaie / Liam Villante vs Crews Enochs / Stephen Enochs2-6, 7-5, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCampbell Harmon / Rob Merrill vs Will George / Jonathan Gregg4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMatthew Cozad / Campbell Harmon vs Drew Akins / Daniel Prata4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJames Kober vs Joseph Bishop1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Coyle / Paul Stanescu vs Michael Larem / Patrick Verstraete1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNeeru Jayanthi / Rob Merrill vs Roberto Bazzarella / Bob Strecansky5-7, 5-7
2025-12-06vs USTA Atlanta/Danie van Den HeeverLost 14
L#1 DoublesPaul Stanescu / Matthew Cozad vs Jonathan Sutjiadi / Inus Daneel4-6, 6-4, 2-6
L#1 SinglesIker Alonso vs Gustavo Anzola1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNeeru Jayanthi / Michael Lahaie vs Andrew Groslimond / Adrian Ooi2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAndre Hames vs Kevin Ye1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoseph Castillo / Mikael Pettersson vs Gert van Den Heever / Danie van Den Heever6-4, 6-3
2025-11-22vs Hudlow (Carter DiFonzo)*Won 40
W#1 DoublesBrian Coyle / Nathaniel Estes vs Daniel Trudell / Justin Reichel6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJames Kober vs Scott Inderrieden6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEddie Gonzalez / Matthew Cozad vs Carter DiFonzo / Federico Ruiz7-5, 3-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNeeru Jayanthi / Danny Klein vs Aidan Coleman / Jacob Eastwood6-4, 6-4
2025-11-15vs Fullers Park (Miguel Este)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesCampbell Harmon / Matthew Cozad vs Douglas Gallagher / Sebastian Nunez6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesIker Alonso vs Stephen Clemons6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrian Coyle / Paul Stanescu vs Miguel Este / Tyler Kane6-7, 6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichael Lahaie vs Howard Huang6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMikael Pettersson / Andre Hames vs Enoch Leung / Johnathon Martin6-3, 5-7, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men (Rey Corpuz) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.66 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Campbell Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.91
Brian Coyle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.79
Matthew Cozad
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.78
James Kober
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Danny Klein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.72
Nathaniel Estes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.70
Iker Alonso
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.68
Rob Merrill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.68
Mikael Pettersson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.68
Andre Hames
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 5
4.55
Michael Lahaie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.54
Liam Villante
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.54
Joseph Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Paul Stanescu
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.35
Neeru Jayanthi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Eddie Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jay Torrence
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Coyle + Paul Stanescu3247% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Campbell Harmon
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Brian Coyle
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.91
Matthew Cozad
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
James Kober
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.78
5
Danny Klein
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nathaniel Estes
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
Iker Alonso
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.70
Rob Merrill
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Mikael Pettersson
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
5
Andre Hames
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Michael Lahaie
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
Liam Villante
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
Joseph Castillo
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.54
Paul Stanescu
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.46
Neeru Jayanthi
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.35
Eddie Gonzalez
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jay Torrence
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.