Teams

LTFC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-20vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Rene Concialdi vs Nicola Zalkind / Letty Flores4-2
L#1 SinglesFauna MacKillip vs Terry Fiala3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShivani Sharma / Lynn Pearson vs Nancy Montini / Carol Parrish6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErin Wade / Robyn Moore vs Judy Mickelson / Beatriz Bonnet6-4, 3-2
2023-07-13vs WC TEALWon 31
W#1 DoublesErica Bruenton / Lynn Pearson vs Crystal Clark / Melanie Adams7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCeline Ormond vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRene Concialdi / Shivani Sharma vs Liz Holt / Amy Wiedeman6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Langenderfer / Fauna MacKillip vs Dana Sandberg / Jennifer Woodrow3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-29vs HV PINKSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTrish Casson / Christine Paulsson vs Holly Gant / Ashley Festoso6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRobyn Moore vs Kris LaValley1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesShivani Sharma / Rene Concialdi vs Kathy Shepherd / Leisha Andersen6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Ruwe / Lynn Pearson vs Deidre Torrey / Amy Dawson4-6, 6-7
2023-06-22vs HFII GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesErica Bruenton / Lynn Pearson vs Jeana Marks / Ann Hugh4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRene Concialdi vs Gretchen Garrison6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShivani Sharma / Trish Casson vs Megan McMorris / Kim MacKendrick5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFauna MacKillip / Allison Langenderfer vs Christine McCarthy / Mary Thompson6-1, 6-1
2023-06-16vs KC-CC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesErin Wade / Christine Paulsson vs Janet Weyhmiller / Leigh Hardin3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLynn Pearson vs Christy Dobson2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErica Bruenton / Karen Ruwe vs Alyssa Elmore / Christie Weber1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCeline Ormond / Robyn Moore vs Nancy Crease / Elizabeth Mathews4-6, 3-6
2023-06-08vs GCC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Trish Casson vs Lauren Clough / Allison Kaelberer7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRene Concialdi vs Mercedes Degiorgis6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErica Bruenton / Celine Ormond vs Hillary Conway / Sarah Dennis6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Ruwe / Robyn Moore vs Breanna Hunt / Emer Dempsey3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Celine Ormond
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Christine Paulsson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Rene Concialdi
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.52
Lynn Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.34
Erin Wade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Robyn Moore
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.27
Trish Casson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Shivani Sharma
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Erica Bruenton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Fauna MacKillip
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Allison Langenderfer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Karen Ruwe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shivani Sharma + Trish Casson4257% games+7.4% vs expected
Lynn Pearson + Christine Paulsson3254% games+4.7% vs expected
Erin Wade + Rene Concialdi5260% games+3.4% vs expected
Fauna MacKillip + Allison Langenderfer272450% games+2.5% vs expected
Robyn Moore + Trish Casson7757% games+0.3% vs expected
Celine Ormond + Rene Concialdi3259% games+0.2% vs expected
Lynn Pearson + Erica Bruenton4257% games+0.1% vs expected
Celine Ormond + Christine Paulsson61050% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celine Ormond
77W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Christine Paulsson
113W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Rene Concialdi
93W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Lynn Pearson
86W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.52
3.5
Erin Wade
101W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Robyn Moore
58W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Trish Casson
75W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Shivani Sharma
46W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Erica Bruenton
40W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Fauna MacKillip
158W–112L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Allison Langenderfer
80W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Karen Ruwe
125W–144L career · 3 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.