Teams

Olympic

2024 FALL A18&O WEEKEND · FALL 18&O 4.5 WOMEN Career

18 players · average NTRP 4.42 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 4.5 WOMEN Career have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
Megan Schembechler
published
4.39
Dori Easdale
published 4.5
Haley Belek
published 4.5
4.24
Maria Zivick
published
4.20
Anne Zivick
published 4.5
4.16
Julie Smith Henson
published
4.14
Deidra Engle
published 4.5
4.13
Michelle Jarrett
published
4.13
Deb Lawrence
published 4.5
4.08
Kathleen Kinnard
published
3.95
Katherine Eisnaugle
published
3.81
Ann Leithauser
published 4
Jana Hrdinova
published
Julia Huffman
published
Katie Canfield
published
Lindsay Fisher
published
Lindsay Katz
published
Tess Tannehill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deidra Engle + Jana Hrdinova14660% games+12.7% vs expected
Julie Smith Henson + Katherine Eisnaugle9561% games+12.0% vs expected
Julia Huffman + Katherine Eisnaugle4259% games+4.7% vs expected
Deidra Engle + Kathleen Kinnard9067% games+4.3% vs expected
Dori Easdale + Megan Schembechler14065% games+4.1% vs expected
Michelle Jarrett + Kathleen Kinnard17560% games+3.5% vs expected
Lindsay Fisher + Ann Leithauser12555% games+3.1% vs expected
Julia Huffman + Kathleen Kinnard4353% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Schembechler
25W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
4.60
4.5
Dori Easdale
30W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Haley Belek
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Zivick
30W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Anne Zivick
24W–17L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
Julie Smith Henson
83W–33L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Deidra Engle
70W–25L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
4.14
Michelle Jarrett
85W–39L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Deb Lawrence
89W–27L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.13
Kathleen Kinnard
139W–43L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Katherine Eisnaugle
64W–37L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.95
4
Ann Leithauser
113W–77L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Jana Hrdinova
47W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julia Huffman
23W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Canfield
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Fisher
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Katz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tess Tannehill
63W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.