Teams

Men's Holiding

REGISTRATION HOLDING - VALID ONLY FOR 2026 SEASON · MEN HOLDING

18 players · average NTRP 3.29 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · MEN HOLDING
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Men's Holiding000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Jacob Burg
published
Andrew Schneider
published 4
3.50
Jeff Turner
published
3.35
Nick Eccles
published
3.34
RUBEN GRADO
published 3.5
3.29
John Hartney
published 3.5
3.27
Scott Laux
published
3.00
Chris Sanchez
published 3
2.98
Chet Paris
published 3.5
2.96
Aaron Brewster
published 3
2.65
Evan Hass
published
2.61
Eric Maul
published
2.61
Kyle Logan
published
2.47
Jon Pulliam
published
2.18
Garry Byers
published 2.5
James Scheper
published
Jeffrey Nemec
published
Terry Rigo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Pulliam + Eric Maul4254% games+8.8% vs expected
Chris Sanchez + Jon Pulliam1536% games−7.9% vs expected
Jon Pulliam + Evan Hass123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacob Burg
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
4.15
4
Andrew Schneider
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeff Turner
5W–20L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Nick Eccles
13W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
RUBEN GRADO
21W–19L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
John Hartney
94W–26L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Scott Laux
15W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Chris Sanchez
13W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Chet Paris
3W–14L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Aaron Brewster
20W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Evan Hass
4W–12L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Eric Maul
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Kyle Logan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
2.61
Jon Pulliam
11W–24L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Garry Byers
8W–41L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
James Scheper
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeffrey Nemec
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Rigo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.