Teams

Pettis/Memphis

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 3.0 Mixed 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-21vs Raymond/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhillip Kirlin / Stephanie Juneau vs Ashley Bush / james wells1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndre Johnson / Amber Pettis vs Kelly Baker / Colt Von Lanken2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-19vs Moon/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmber Pettis / Markeno Lester vs Amber Varner / Keith Gibson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeressia Williamson / Devarius Minor vs Amasa Lacy / Christopher Heimann1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Anderson / Joshua Anderson vs Kara Kane / Adam Bratton0-6, 0-6
2026-07-12vs Wright/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Juneau / Phillip Kirlin vs Lacey Craig / Luke Hooper6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNeda Nazemi / Markeno Lester vs Jenni Harris / Patrick Wright6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaire Murk / Devarius Minor vs Laura Weaver / Timothy Weaver6-0, 6-3
2026-06-28vs Gronostaj/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndre Johnson / Neda Nazemi vs Lauren Heard / Hunter Hancock1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeressia Williamson / Darrius Samples vs Natalie Souder / Hunter Mitchell1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Murk / Markeno Lester vs Sally Gillum / Jared Denney4-6, 1-6
2026-06-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesClaire Murk / Darrius Samples vs Jennifer London / Stephen Stroud2-6, 1-6
2026-06-23vs Gibbs/MemphisLost 01
L#2 DoublesDevarius Minor / Claire Murk vs Ami Tasker / Jason Noffsinger1-6, 2-6
2026-06-07vs Magness/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndre Johnson / Neda Nazemi vs Neal Halter / Estelle Mitchell6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPhillip Kirlin / Stephanie Juneau vs Kyle Gan / Cristina Guibao7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoshua Anderson / Christine Anderson vs Temika Barber / Sagar Pathak6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gronostaj/Memphis43111021176
2McGuire/Memphis2481023186
3Pettis/Memphis1551328180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Neda Nazemi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Phillip Kirlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Claire Murk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Andre Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Jeressia Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.87
Amber Pettis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Joshua Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neda Nazemi
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
Phillip Kirlin
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Claire Murk
10W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Andre Johnson
6W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Jeressia Williamson
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Amber Pettis
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Joshua Anderson
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.