Teams

Lori Hunt

2025 Springfield Adult Mixed 40 & Over League · 6.0 Adult Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-28vs Melissa CoxSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLinda Putman / Greg Pearman vs Ashlei Woelk / Nick Hansen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori Hunt / Tony Roldan vs Carol Goldstein / Shawn Rhodes3-6, 3-6
2025-07-21vs Melissa CoxLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Mayr / Greg White vs Carol Goldstein / Shawn Rhodes2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTijuana Julian / Jeff Marlin vs Nick Hansen / Ashlei Woelk3-6, 5-7
2025-07-14vs Melissa CoxWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Marlin / Linda Putman vs Melissa Cox / Shawn Rhodes6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKenya Pearman / Greg Pearman vs Brian Hayes / Carol Goldstein6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Mayr / Greg White vs Nick Hansen / Ashlei Woelk4-6, 3-6
2025-07-07vs Melissa CoxLost 03
L#1 DoublesTony Roldan / Lori Hunt vs Kevin Liljenquist / Melissa Cox4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Marlin / Tijuana Julian vs Carol Goldstein / Shawn Rhodes4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKenya Pearman / Greg Pearman vs Nick Hansen / Ashlei Woelk3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Adult Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Melissa Cox2284894
2Lori Hunt224818125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Kenya Pearman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Greg Pearman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Tijuana Julian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Marlin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Putman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Hunt
published
Susan Mayr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tony Roldan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenya Pearman + Greg Pearman1429% gamesnot enough data
Tijuana Julian + Jeff Marlin044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenya Pearman
27W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Greg Pearman
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
Tijuana Julian
21W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.77
Jeff Marlin
22W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Putman
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Hunt
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Mayr
18W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Roldan
17W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.