← Teams

CRRC-Ferrer/Jarvis

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.72 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Kevin Jarvis
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.13
Sarah Ferrer
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 4.5
3.98
Michele Sutherland
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Nick Hooker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Spencer Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Trina Newcomb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.79
Carol Glenn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2018-11-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Alana Miner vs Ashley Gwin / Cameron Early6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTrina Newcomb / Kevin Jarvis vs Geri Marcus / Richard Clark6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarol Glenn / Spencer Byrd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-11-03Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesSpencer Byrd / Anh Nguyen vs Andrea Findley / Jeffrey Fuchs7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Alana Miner vs Ivy Lane / Thomas MacDonald6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNick Hooker / Nicola Ash vs Denise Visse / Monte Gonzales6-3, 6-4
2018-10-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSpencer Byrd / Anh Nguyen vs Jane King Ayers / Eric Ayers3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Jennifer Weaver / Manoj Agnihotri6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNick Hooker / Nicola Ash vs Ashok Nedungadi / Victoria Chamberlain6-3, 6-4
2018-10-21Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesCarol Glenn / Robert Glenn vs Achala Kaushikkar / Udayan Kapaley2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnh Nguyen / Kevin Jarvis vs Kate Wilkinson / Kim Fjeldsted7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicola Ash / Duy Nguyen vs Michelle Cole / PAUL ERICKSON6-0
2018-10-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKevin Jarvis / Michele Sutherland vs Leah Black / Dave Sasaki6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSpencer Byrd / Sarah Ferrer vs Trylla Lembke / Scott Lembke6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Glenn / Duy Nguyen vs JULIE ANDREWS / Matt Savage5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2018-09-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKevin Jarvis / Michele Sutherland vs William Seidl / Erin Casey6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNick Hooker / Sarah Ferrer vs Hilary Johnson / Michael McTague6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSpencer Byrd / Nicola Ash vs Julie LaMontagne / Steve Siegel6-0, 6-0
2018-09-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDuy Nguyen / Trina Newcomb vs Dipali Dixit / Manoj Agnihotri6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Anh Nguyen vs Melissa Leibowitz / Ken Leibowitz6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSpencer Byrd / Sarah Ferrer vs Jane King Ayers / Eric Ayers6-1, 6-1
2018-09-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDuy Nguyen / Trina Newcomb vs Bret Crawford / Susan Robblee6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Jarvis / Michele Sutherland vs Dave Sato / Kim Tellin6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNick Hooker / Nicola Ash vs Philip Mark / Ann Hays6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kevin Jarvis
31W–3L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Sarah Ferrer
145W–57L career
1%99%0%
4.13
4
Michele Sutherland
332W–175L career
0%87%13%
3.98
4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.82
3.5
Spencer Byrd
82W–43L career
0%54%46%
3.60
3.5
Trina Newcomb
79W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07
3
Carol Glenn
82W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.