Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10

2026 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
W#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Laurie Manley6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesSandra Zane / Robin Brown vs Ariana Garcia / Samantha De La Rosa4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Ana Cortez - (DQ)*4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKay Taylor / Alice Markowski vs Paula Quesada / Lisa Santana7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLea Zhang / Christine Pedroza vs Cesiah Torres / Sofia Garcia6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMichaela Nazareno vs Viviana Kim2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlice Markowski / Leslie Le vs Lilly Shuton / Hoan Tiffany Lau6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRuyu Hua vs Victoria Rose0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJing Feng / Lea Zhang vs Amy Soong Tsai / Regina Cheung1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMichaela Nazareno vs Antoinette Lessuk6-2, 6-2
2026-06-07vs SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SA4Lost 14
L#1 DoublesRobin Brown / Leslie Le vs Maree Lingao / Nancy Tran1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Umaa Rebbapragada1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Jiang / Lea Zhang vs Annsley Matthiessen / Marie Nguyen1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRuyu Hua vs Eileen Chun-Fruto6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKay Taylor / Alice Markowski vs Kiera Nowacki / Theresa Sterling6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Andrea Torng2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Christine Wu6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRobin Brown / Sandra Zane vs Miki Makiko Shimizu / Celeste Torres6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Laura Laun6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJing Feng / Rebecca Berman vs Carol Chan / Ayuko Siegel1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMichaela Nazareno vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlice Markowski / Kay Taylor vs Sophia Chang / Hae Oh6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesKay Taylor / Alice Markowski vs Anne Neal / Raylynn Roland4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Dana Bailey6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Pedroza / Robin Brown vs Maria Sambito / Marie Honda7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichaela Nazareno vs Feiming Morgan6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJing Feng / Tiffany Giang vs Linda Lopez / Debra Sudo4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRuyu Hua vs Antoinette Lessuk6-7
L#3 DoublesLea Zhang / Alice Markowski vs Gail Gerbode / Alison Shore3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRobin Brown / Carmen Martinez vs Yoko Kanayama / Janna Conner-Niclaes2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Jiang / Tiffany Giang vs Lisa Noah / Jessica Guerrero2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAlice Markowski / Kay Taylor vs Brett Bennett / Sean Ky6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Julia Arnold6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobin Brown / Skyla Carter vs Angeline Chow / Terry Meng6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPenny Zhang vs Francesca Gill7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTiffany Giang / Sandra Zane vs Nancy Wong-Thomas / Audrey Thomas6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeslie Le vs Katie Tong4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Michaela Nazareno
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Pam Barbato
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Leslie Jiang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Rebecca Berman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Skyla Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Penny Zhang
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.14
Holly Metts
published 3.5
3.12
Carmen Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Leslie Le
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Tiffany Giang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Sandra Zane
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Christine Pedroza
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.86
Alice Markowski
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.86
Ruyu Hua
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
2.26
Lea Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Jiang + Sandra Zane2446% games−3.0% vs expected
Sandra Zane + Pam Barbato2642% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michaela Nazareno
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Pam Barbato
100W–64L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Leslie Jiang
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Rebecca Berman
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Skyla Carter
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
Penny Zhang
51W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.15
3.5
Holly Metts
10W–19L career · type S · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Carmen Martinez
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Leslie Le
22W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Tiffany Giang
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Christine Pedroza
39W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Alice Markowski
70W–69L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Ruyu Hua
7W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Lea Zhang
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.