Teams

Janiszewski/META

2026 Adult 18 & Over-META · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-19vs Mo/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Pencarinha / Joan Hagood vs Jane Dean / Kirsten Hoskins6-4, 2-3
L#2 DoublesKelly Kattesh / Jessica Alzamora vs Madga Cox / Regan Jordan2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Anneke Self vs Anita Jilton / Keo Jur1-6, 4-6
2026-04-19vs Mo/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesAnneke Self / Christina Betancourt vs Ju Mo / Makie Kordamiri1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKim Cartier / Jessica Alzamora vs Jane Dean / Kirsten Hoskins0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Kasten / Margaret Wells vs Regan Jordan / Kari Holt0-6, 1-6
2026-04-12vs Mo/METALost 04
L#1 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Debbie Pencarinha vs Lynne Little / Eve Little Bradford1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Kattesh vs Millie Pendola2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Anneke Self vs Kirsten Hoskins / Jane Dean1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMargaret Wells / Kim Cartier vs Kari Holt / Regan Jordan1-6, 1-6
2026-04-08vs Mo/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Debbie Pencarinha vs Lynne Little / Eve Little Bradford1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Hagood / Barb Janiszewski vs Regan Jordan / Ju Mo1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Kasten / Margaret Wells vs Madga Cox / Millie Pendola2-6, 1-6
2026-04-01vs Mo/METALost 04
L#1 DoublesJoan Hagood / Christina Betancourt vs Kirsten Hoskins / Jane Dean2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Kattesh vs Ju Mo0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Debbie Pencarinha vs Eve Little Bradford / Lynne Little2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Kasten / Margaret Wells vs Keo Jur / Anita Jilton1-6, 0-6
2026-03-25vs Mo/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Kattesh / Christina Betancourt vs Anita Jilton / Madga Cox1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBettina Chirica vs Millie Pendola6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJoan Hagood / Barb Janiszewski vs Regan Jordan / Kari Holt5-7, 4-6
2026-03-15vs Mo/METALost 04
L#1 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Bettina Chirica vs Lynne Little / Eve Little Bradford2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Alzamora vs Madga Cox2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Hagood / Anneke Self vs Regan Jordan / Keo Jur2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Janice Kasten vs Makie Kordamiri / Anita Jilton1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mo/META70271398
2Janiszewski/META0712754331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Christina Betancourt
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Debbie Pencarinha
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.78
Anneke Self
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Bettina Chirica
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Kelly Kattesh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Barb Janiszewski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.58
Joan Hagood
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.48
Margaret Wells
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Jessica Alzamora
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kim Cartier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Hagood + Barb Janiszewski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina Betancourt
5W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Debbie Pencarinha
3W–7L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Anneke Self
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Bettina Chirica
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Kattesh
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Barb Janiszewski
12W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60
Joan Hagood
6W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Margaret Wells
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Jessica Alzamora
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Kim Cartier
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.