Teams

MEA NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-28vs BRMST BLACKWon 10
W#1 SinglesSamuel Elting vs Joel Walter6-4, 6-2
2024-05-14vs RMTC BLACKWon 10
W#1 SinglesSamuel Elting vs Stuart Dimson6-2, 6-1
2024-05-07vs LTA-Q GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesSamuel Elting vs Michael Matheson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-04-30vs LTA-P GREENWon 10
W#2 SinglesSamuel Elting vs Mark Creek7-5, 6-3
2024-04-23vs TTA BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesSamuel Elting vs Andy Roemersberger7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
John Ruder
published
Eric Six
published 3.5
3.25
Samuel Elting
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Brian Westnedge
published 3.5
3.16
Bill Martin
published 3.5
3.10
Steve Craig
published
3.05
Andy Pobywajlo
published 3.5
3.02
Michael McDowell
published
2.98
William Sivy
published
2.92
Dave Green
published 3
2.80
Jim Normandeau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Green + Jim Normandeau8265% games+5.3% vs expected
John Ruder + William Sivy4253% games+0.8% vs expected
Michael McDowell + Brian Westnedge6747% games−1.9% vs expected
Andy Pobywajlo + John Ruder2347% games−7.3% vs expected
Steve Craig + Eric Six314 matchesnot enough data
Bill Martin + Eric Six314 matchesnot enough data
Steve Craig + Andy Pobywajlo123 matchesnot enough data
Steve Craig + Bill Martin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Ruder
24W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Eric Six
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Samuel Elting
17W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brian Westnedge
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Bill Martin
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.16
Steve Craig
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Andy Pobywajlo
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Michael McDowell
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
William Sivy
14W–23L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Dave Green
22W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jim Normandeau
21W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.