Teams

Rick - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-09vs Jasionowski - RS HardLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Brownlee / TRISH STOKES vs Tori Marsh-Bergosh / Katie Cooper-Bussell6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPATRICIA Ghiglino / Anne Douglass Williams vs Rhonda Springer / Alicia Brizuela7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Harmon / Abigail Rick vs Ann Marie Jasionowski / Katherine Ross4-6, 5-7
2025-10-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Washington / Abigail Rick vs Cheryl Vann / Amatul Bean1-6, 1-6
2025-10-01vs Marsden - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesTRISH STOKES / Michelle Washington vs Dana Persons / Shari Essex0-6, 3-6
2025-09-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Washington / Kelly Brown vs Aivel Dadisman / Cherie Tan2-6, 0-6
2025-09-11vs Wilson - RS HardLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Washington / PATRICIA Ghiglino vs Kacee Bidnick / Savannah Wilson2-6, 1-6
2025-09-04vs Gross - RS HardLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Washington / Anne Douglass Williams vs Hunter Strobel / Samantha Lee Kuhn0-6, 3-6
2025-08-28vs Schweigert - PCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Way / TRISH STOKES vs Natalie Mcelhany / Valerie Wilson0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Harmon / PATRICIA Ghiglino vs April Schweigert / LAURY KOONTZ2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAbigail Rick / Vanessa Thibodeaux vs Elizabeth Dudney / Jennifer Washington1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Douglass Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Michelle Washington
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
PATRICIA Ghiglino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Natalie Nguyen
published
2.39
Abigail Rick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
TRISH STOKES
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Vanessa Thibodeaux
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abigail Rick + Vanessa Thibodeaux123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Douglass Williams
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Washington
44W–103L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
PATRICIA Ghiglino
6W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Natalie Nguyen
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
2.5
Abigail Rick
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
TRISH STOKES
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Thibodeaux
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.