Teams

AYTC-Live Laugh Lob-Kim

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.04 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-20vs BAIN-The Volley Parton’s-FanbergLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlice Chang vs Kathleen Ericksen6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-12vs WSC-Party at the Net-KrammerLost 14
L#1 DoublesJen Hinnant / Noelle Ericson vs Savitha Krammer / Asawari Chingale6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJamie Kim vs Laine Meadows5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Morse / Namchee Chan vs Nancy Rodriguez / Cynthia Padilla2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesRachel Kim vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Zimmer / Kristen Modie vs Kathy Tsutsumoto / Lynn Dai1-6, 2-6
2023-05-06vs NTC-KennedyLost 23
W#1 DoublesAlice Chang / Jen Hinnant vs Andrea Petzel / Sinead ODonovan7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJamie Kim vs Daisy Cullop4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNamchee Chan / Rebecca Zimmer vs Sarah Wilke / Katharine Mancini2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMeg Viera vs Katherine Chung2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Morse / Cheryl Borgonia vs Lauren Nishikawa / Erin Kennedy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAlice Chang / Jen Hinnant vs Molly Linhardt / Karen Rice6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Kim vs Rachael Alnwick6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNamchee Chan / Rebecca Zimmer vs Annie Fanberg / Rebecca Whitlock3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMeg Viera vs Emily Gooch4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Morse / Noelle Ericson vs Amy Wetter / Lissa Dashe6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-30vs MC-W 3.0-White/LaRosaWon 32
W#1 DoublesNoelle Ericson / Jen Hinnant vs Jill LaRosa / Jane Repensek6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAlice Chang vs Rosalind Kitikiatisak6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Kim / Amy Morse vs Mara White / Carolyn Atkinson6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMeg Viera vs Connie Elim6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRebecca Zimmer / Kristen Modie vs Penny Jay / Debbie Schrock6-7, 1-6
2023-04-22vs CP-CarlsonWon 41
W#1 DoublesJamie Kim / Alice Chang vs Deborah Oroszlan / Shelly Enstrom6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMeg Viera vs Heidi Nevin6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRebecca Zimmer / Kristen Modie vs Susanna Wilken / Michelle Dauphiny Becker3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesAndrea Tapia vs Amy Wang6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Morse / Namchee Chan vs Marcia Chapman / Lillian Stauber6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesNoelle Ericson / Kristen Modie vs Deidra Ducheane / Tracy McCarron3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlice Chang vs Danielle Pratt7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNamchee Chan / Amy Morse vs Carolyn Smith / Kristen Stead2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRebecca Zimmer vs Emily Jackson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Tapia / Rachel Kim vs Julie Dewitt / Bunny Rogan2-6, 1-6
2023-04-08vs BC-Tursa/AndersonWon 32
L#1 DoublesJen Hinnant / Alice Chang vs Elizabeth Norris - (DQ)* / Priyanka Prasad1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Kim vs Bridget Haba2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNoelle Ericson / Rebecca Zimmer vs Sheri Olsen / Vikki Littleman2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMeg Viera vs Ellen Yoon6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJesenka Berberovich / Kristen Modie vs Rosie Mastrandrea / Carolina DeHaan3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings40 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-ETC-Wyer803739202
2BC-Bloch8031926276
3CAC/SL-Causing a Racquet, Part Two-McCarron71301025281
4TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin71291129278
5TCSP-Smash Girls-Miller71291131303
6ETC-Goldbloom-Grotle71261434322
7BC-Court Angels-Angelone62281229301
8NWW-MI-Lin62281229274
9RBW-Wyman62291130293
10HBSQ-Slice Girls-Counter62261435309
11NTC-Falcons-Wood62251539317
12BC-Brylemore Ballers-Bryant62251540357
13CAC/SL-Net Nuts-Coley53261434339
14BAIN-The Volley Parton’s-Fanberg53261436308
15MI-Crush It! Lee53241638328
16RBW-Gibson53211942343
17TCSP-Sharks-Daniels53231743367
18BETC-Happy and Wiser Aces-Grove53211945370
19BC-Racquet Ready-Gerity44202044357
20AYTC-Awesome Fun! Lusty44202046360
21ETC-Eastside Breakers-Landry-Navarro44182249369
22AYTC-Live Laugh Lob-Kim44182250376
23MC-W 3.0-White/LaRosa35192147371
24AYTC-Alleycats-Murch35192148375
25STC-The Mergers-Stroble35192148347
26RBW-Group Therapy-English35182252412
27RTC-Guattare35172353390
28AYTC-Trumbauer35162454391
29BETC-Smash It Up-Schiller26172351356
30EDG-Adkins/Keller26142654376
31HBSQ-Hong/Matysik26142656403
32TCSP-Sorry/Not Sorry-Kane26122858396
33TCSP-Mood Swings-Thorne26132762429
34WSC-Smart Aces-Kim17112961423
35BC-Pocket Aces-Leahy17112963432
36STC-Volley Girls-Crabs17103065416
37AYTC-Netchix-Swanson0893164429
38CP-Carlson0893167447
39WSC-Raquettes 3.0-Onu0863469442
40WSC-Longhorns-Zheng0813977467

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jamie Kim
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Namchee Chan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Jen Hinnant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Alice Chang
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3.5
2.82
Meg Viera
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.74
Jesenka Berberovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Rebecca Zimmer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
Cheryl Borgonia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Amy Morse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kristen Modie
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Rachel Kim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.02
Andrea Tapia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jesenka Berberovich + Cheryl Borgonia4449% games+12.7% vs expected
Jamie Kim + Alice Chang7162% games+11.6% vs expected
Alice Chang + Jen Hinnant6254% games+6.7% vs expected
Jamie Kim + Jen Hinnant6648% games+5.2% vs expected
Rebecca Zimmer + Namchee Chan1448% games+4.3% vs expected
Jesenka Berberovich + Kristen Modie3648% games+3.6% vs expected
Rebecca Zimmer + Meg Viera2450% games+2.9% vs expected
Rebecca Zimmer + Cheryl Borgonia3440% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Kim
72W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Namchee Chan
59W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Jen Hinnant
43W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Alice Chang
38W–21L career · 7 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Meg Viera
35W–67L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Jesenka Berberovich
47W–52L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Rebecca Zimmer
66W–126L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Cheryl Borgonia
64W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Amy Morse
45W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Kristen Modie
27W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Rachel Kim
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Andrea Tapia
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.