Teams

Chateau Elan-Watts

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-13Lost 02
L#1 SinglesErica Cahoon vs Lindsay Hofmann0-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesStephanie Joedecke / Karen Gratton vs Mary Geil / Lori Warren2-6, 6-4
2024-11-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Joedecke / Karen Gratton vs Amber Carter / Kim Reeves6-7, 1-6
2024-10-23vs Sardis-PinkertonLost 02
L#1 SinglesErica Cahoon vs Brandy Bailey3-6, 7-5, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine McClendon / Karen Gratton vs DeAnna Emborski / Elcira Pinkerton7-5, 5-7
2024-10-09vs CCC-CauseyLost 01
L#4 DoublesKaren Tinker / Erica Cahoon vs Barbara Griffeth / Maggie Bennett4-6, 7-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Sonya Watts
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Erica Cahoon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Heide Rudnick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Jennifer Bestermann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Christine McClendon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Liz Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Suzanne Miller
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Melissa Almon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Karen Tinker
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Jennifer Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Gratton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Calvert
published
Rhonda Kupka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Joedecke
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine McClendon + Jennifer Fuller6453% games+4.0% vs expected
Christine McClendon + Erica Cahoon4252% games+0.5% vs expected
Melissa Almon + Heide Rudnick314 matchesnot enough data
Christine McClendon + Liz Murphy224 matchesnot enough data
Liz Murphy + Jennifer Fuller123 matchesnot enough data
Erica Cahoon + Jennifer Fuller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonya Watts
27W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.47
Erica Cahoon
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Heide Rudnick
32W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Jennifer Bestermann
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Christine McClendon
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Liz Murphy
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Suzanne Miller
31W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Melissa Almon
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Karen Tinker
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Jennifer Fuller
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
Karen Gratton
1W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Calvert
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Kupka
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Joedecke
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.