Teams

Ma.Gregson18C7.5

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.95 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-05Won 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Goff / Michael Weslander vs Oheneba Boateng / Christopher MacK6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGavin Mazurak / Ryan Berliner vs Francis Bustard / Deraymes Harris6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMaxwell Gregson / Amit Sachan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-28vs Br.McLean18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Scherr / Ryan Goff vs Brooks Lowe / Tyler Priest6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJason High / Jim Riddick vs Douglas Marks / Jonathan Drum6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesParker Venator / Ryan Berliner vs Jason McGeorge / Amir Lyall7-5, 6-4
2025-09-15vs Jo.VanCampen18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Scherr / Sterling Thomas vs John van Campen / Wes Snead2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesParker Venator / Michael Weslander vs Mark Camacho / Charley Yu7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCameron Crump / Marcelo Roschel vs Mike Kaelin / Pete Padilla6-4, 6-2
2025-09-14vs St.Wingo18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesAubry Carmody / Marcelo Roschel vs Andrew Chan / Sean Toner6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJim Riddick / Sterling Thomas vs Jason Widen / Micah Widen6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesParker Venator / Michael Weslander vs Brent Townsend / West Ludwig6-3, 6-2
2025-09-08vs Ke.Glanville18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesJason High / Jim Riddick vs Jesse Saunders / Srivatsan Ramesh6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Pham / Marcelo Roschel vs Jonathan Carter / Monty Gaither6-4, 6-3
2025-08-24vs Ch.Wasko18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Scherr / Sterling Thomas vs Joshua Ganeles / Nate Wireback6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGavin Mazurak / Michael Weslander vs Nicolas Quevedo / Will Howell6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaxwell Gregson / Amit Sachan vs Raymond Xu / Sheldon Roberts2-6, 1-6
2025-08-17vs Mi.Ratliff18C7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Goff / Mark Scherr vs Pedro Loaiza / Charles Gowland7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGavin Mazurak / Michael Weslander vs Gabe Jimenez / Ted Lotchin6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAndrew Pham / Marcelo Roschel vs Michael Ratliff / Montgomery Fletcher7-5, 6-3
2025-08-10vs Ti.Koves18CWon 21
L#1 DoublesGavin Mazurak / Cameron Crump vs Philip Robertson / Chris Mauro6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Scherr / Ryan Goff vs Elden LeGaux / Aaron Heil6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJason High / Jim Riddick vs Rob Sellick / Jeffrey Brooks7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Cameron Crump
published 4.5
4.08
Michael Weslander
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
4.02
Aubry Carmody
published 4
3.98
Jim Riddick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.93
Parker Venator
published
3.93
Maxwell Gregson
published
3.89
Mark Scherr
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.75
Ryan Berliner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Sterling Thomas
published
3.69
Gavin Mazurak
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.67
Marcelo Roschel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Jason High
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Ryan Goff
published
3.39
Amit Sachan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Riddick + Mark Scherr7458% games+2.6% vs expected
Jim Riddick + Jason High271260% games−1.3% vs expected
Mark Scherr + Ryan Berliner7454% games−1.6% vs expected
Jim Riddick + Michael Weslander5257% gamesnot enough data
Mark Scherr + Michael Weslander6166% gamesnot enough data
Mark Scherr + Maxwell Gregson404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Weslander + Jason High314 matchesnot enough data
Mark Scherr + Jason High303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cameron Crump
11W–20L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Michael Weslander
218W–93L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
4
Aubry Carmody
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Jim Riddick
172W–87L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Parker Venator
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Maxwell Gregson
25W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Mark Scherr
144W–67L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Ryan Berliner
113W–104L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Sterling Thomas
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Gavin Mazurak
119W–63L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Marcelo Roschel
115W–59L career · 10 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Jason High
135W–55L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
3.48
Ryan Goff
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Amit Sachan
256W–241L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.