Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Hofstad-WN/ SU8

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-18vs LLW SGV Wild Cards-Tang-WN Su12Lost 02
L#1 DoublesFranciz Bragg / Cara Hofstad vs Judy Su / Trisha Rickard0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRoxanne Stevens / Adrienne Beauvois vs Karla Garcia / Cynthia Garcia0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJina Lee / Sherie Paulson vs Jenniffer Wong / Christie Boniface0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLeticia Arreola / Cara Hofstad vs Mae Huey / Tamami Kimura1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCara Hofstad / Franciz Bragg vs Stephanie Perry / Kasia Chmielewski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJina Lee / Adrienne Beauvois vs Aram Hamidi / Amy Newhall3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRoxanne Stevens / Adrienne Beauvois vs Sheila Purdy / Kathy Wilkinson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDarlene Scott / Sherie Paulson vs Raha Nazer / Marilyn Olson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-30vs SGV Dynamic Duos -Chow-WN/SA8Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEllie Wei / Sherie Paulson vs Deann McCormick / Theresa Winterburn5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesFranciz Bragg / Cara Hofstad vs Cindi Carter / Penapa Frick2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesFranciz Bragg / Cara Hofstad vs Elyse Gainor / Jacquelin Hoppenjans6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Beauvois / Ying Li vs Summer Shelton / Kathleen McDowell6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCara Hofstad / Franciz Bragg vs Karen Vidal / Gloria Ziperovich6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCara Hofstad / Franciz Bragg vs Alison Harma / Lisa Szeto1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Hung / Sherie Paulson vs Loretta Peng / MINA OKAMOTO1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Adrienne Beauvois
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Cara Hofstad
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.67
Franciz Bragg
published 4
3.62
Darlene Scott
published 4
3.57
Ellie Wei
published 4
3.43
Sherie Paulson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Tammy Hung
published
Ronalyn Raymundo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cara Hofstad + Franciz Bragg11852% games−1.5% vs expected
Adrienne Beauvois + Cara Hofstad13856% games−3.9% vs expected
Adrienne Beauvois + Franciz Bragg2444% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adrienne Beauvois
152W–120L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Cara Hofstad
218W–155L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Franciz Bragg
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Darlene Scott
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Ellie Wei
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Sherie Paulson
102W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Tammy Hung
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Ronalyn Raymundo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.