Teams

Dennis - Singles Ladies

2026 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 6 played
Sep 17 9:00 PM
Norbeck Country Club
2026-08-26vs Pena Castro - Ball too wellLost 02
L#1 SinglesTerri Esterowitz vs Lily Kosegarten0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesStacy Stratton vs Caitlin Lee2-6, 0-6
2026-08-19vs Pena Castro - Ball too wellSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTerri Esterowitz vs Ana Maria Pena Castro6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChloe Snook vs Caitlin Lee1-6, 2-6
2026-08-15vs Pena Castro - Ball too wellLost 12
L#1 SinglesChloe Snook vs Lily Kosegarten0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJenna Gietl vs Ruchi Nanda6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesStacy Stratton vs Kim Dowd1-6, 4-6
2026-08-11vs Pena Castro - Ball too wellWon 21
L#1 SinglesJennifer Cullum vs Lily Kosegarten1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesTerri Esterowitz vs Caitlin Lee6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesChloe Snook vs Kim Dowd6-3, 6-2
2026-07-28vs Pena Castro - Ball too wellWon 21
W#1 SinglesJenna Gietl vs Ruchi Nanda6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChloe Snook vs Yiziying Chen3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesStacy Stratton vs Mary Arrington6-4, 6-1
2026-07-09vs Pena Castro - Ball too wellWon 30
W#1 SinglesKelly Dennis vs Yiziying Chen6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer Cullum vs Kayley Duval6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJenna Gietl vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Montgomery Singles 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dennis - Singles Ladies329614109
2Pena Castro - Ball too well236918119

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Jenna Gietl
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Kelly Dennis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.23
Terri Esterowitz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.11
Jennifer Cullum
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Alison Bailey
published 4.5
4.10
Liz Christensen
published 4.5
4.08
Arina Kravitz
published 4.5
4.04
Chloe Snook
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Stacy Stratton
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Dennis + Alison Bailey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jenna Gietl
133W–117L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Kelly Dennis
19W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Terri Esterowitz
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Jennifer Cullum
22W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Alison Bailey
23W–23L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Liz Christensen
123W–44L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Arina Kravitz
19W–26L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Chloe Snook
16W–29L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.04
Stacy Stratton
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.