Teams

TOC.Hariharan

2024 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-19vs TOC.HorowitzSplit 11
L#1 SinglesVijay Rajasekar vs Jon Rodriguez6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRanga Narasimhan vs Daniel Horowitz6-2, 7-5
2024-07-30vs TOC.NealisWon 20
W#1 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs John Nealis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRanga Narasimhan vs Taylor VICK4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-23vs TOC.RamaswamyLost 02
L#1 SinglesVijay Rajasekar vs Amit Sachan4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRam Basireddy vs Steven Harris2-6, 2-6
2024-07-16vs TOC.MehraLost 01
L#2 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Karan Mehra1-6, 3-6
2024-06-25vs MCP.MizeWon 20
W#1 SinglesRanga Narasimhan vs Luo Xiao3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesVijay Rajasekar vs David Mize6-2, 6-1
2024-06-18vs KF.DanielSplit 11
L#1 SinglesVijay Rajasekar vs Stephane Daniel5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRam Basireddy vs Zachary Zeidler7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-11Lost 01
L#3 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Vivek Singh4-6, 1-6
2024-06-04vs PW.HaywardWon 10
W#1 SinglesRanga Narasimhan vs Marc Hastings0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Ranga Narasimhan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.52
Pradeep Hariharan
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.37
Seshagiri Kalluru
published
3.29
Susanta Padhi
published
3.27
Vijay Rajasekar
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Vimal Kumar
published
2.98
Ram Basireddy
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pradeep Hariharan + Ram Basireddy314 matchesnot enough data
Seshagiri Kalluru + Vimal Kumar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ranga Narasimhan
56W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.54
4
Pradeep Hariharan
197W–109L career · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Seshagiri Kalluru
28W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
Susanta Padhi
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Vijay Rajasekar
37W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Vimal Kumar
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Ram Basireddy
52W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.