Teams

Its Coming to You

2021 Montgomery Adult 40 & Over Spring · Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-08vs Battle Ready 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Jeannie Park vs Carol Besse / Wendy Heger2-6, 1-6
2021-08-04vs RubinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesRani Jeeva Nguyen-Khoa / Dina Caddeo vs Jenny Hinshaw / Shalita Williams2-6, 5-7
2021-07-25vs Honey BadgersLost 02
L#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Anita Wilson7-5, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDina Caddeo / Sally Stone vs Kimberly Mielcarek / Dana MacHer0-6, 1-6
2021-07-16vs BallbustersLost 01
L#2 DoublesRani Jeeva Nguyen-Khoa / Mia Piansay vs Sol Lopez / Christine Bragale2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-30vs Battle Ready 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMesanie Lee / Dina Caddeo vs Michele Brammer / Jessica Lee2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMia Piansay / Angela Lee vs Carol Besse / Mary Papadopulos1-6, 0-6
2021-06-20vs Honey BadgersLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Fitzgerald / Dina Caddeo vs Kimberly Mielcarek / Cara Holtmann3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
PAULA SMITH
published
3.68
Tynika Wilson
published
3.59
Maria Vassileva
published
3.55
Laura McInerney
published
3.46
Dina Caddeo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
3.27
Mesanie Lee
published
Donna Fitzgerald
published 3.5
3.21
Mia Piansay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Angela Lee
published 3.5
Jeannie Park
published
Karen Robertson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PAULA SMITH + Tynika Wilson201850% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

PAULA SMITH
48W–32L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Tynika Wilson
22W–23L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Maria Vassileva
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
Laura McInerney
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Dina Caddeo
138W–171L career · 5 lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
Rani Jeeva Nguyen-Khoa
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
3.42
Mesanie Lee
26W–27L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Donna Fitzgerald
11W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Mia Piansay
244W–303L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Angela Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jeannie Park
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Robertson
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.