Teams

Brad 4.0

2022 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-14vs Harvin 4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesJagadish Akula / Dwayne Herndon vs Jagannath Surampudi / Mike James6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDavid Nazari / Bradley Jacques vs Kevin Gass / Don Barry7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-06vs Harvin 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / Joseph Martin vs Don Barry / Todd Woolpert6-2, 6-4
2022-06-02vs Harvin 4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesJagadish Akula / Wornden Ly vs James Mellendick / Kevin Bobofchak6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHans Elmlund / Bradley Jacques vs Phillip Harvin / Don Barry2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-30vs Harvin 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesWornden Ly / DONALD CRAWLEY vs Joseph Bahorich / Kevin Gass6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / Jagadish Akula vs Phillip Harvin / Dennis Weikel6-3, 7-6
2022-05-28vs Harvin 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / Jeff Brainard vs Joseph Bahorich / Dennis Weikel6-4, 7-6
2022-05-19vs Harvin 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Wornden Ly vs Joseph Bahorich / Kevin Bobofchak6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / Renat Gataullin vs James Mellendick / Phillip Harvin6-4, 6-3
2022-05-17vs Harvin 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJagadish Akula / Jeff Brainard vs Kevin Bobofchak / James Mellendick3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-05vs Harvin 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Brainard / Jagadish Akula vs Mike James / James Mellendick6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Jagadish Akula
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
David Nazari
published 4
3.72
Juan Jose Tijero
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.69
Brandon Yen
published 4
3.59
Bradley Jacques
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.53
Paul Brennan
published
3.28
Hans Elmlund
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jagadish Akula
49W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
DONALD CRAWLEY
473W–252L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
David Nazari
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Juan Jose Tijero
606W–366L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Brandon Yen
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Bradley Jacques
192W–208L career · 7 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
Paul Brennan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Hans Elmlund
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.