Teams

Is.Gesher55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-03vs Ka.McKee55AWon 10
W#1 DoublesIsabelle Homes Gesher / Mollie Hodl vs Pam Rigsby / Lynne Manweiler6-4, 6-0
2024-04-24vs Ka.McKee55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Burkard / Holly Camak vs Juli Korsnack / Pam Rigsby0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Dubach / Lauren Boole vs Leigh Magee / Sarah Mulligan2-6, 3-6
2024-04-12vs Su.Greer55ALost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Smith / Mollie Hodl vs Kimberley Matthews / Sally Spetz7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Lekan / Lauren Boole vs Susan Doninger Greer / Kim McDonald1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Burkard / Mary Cockrill vs Susan Cook / Noelle Jackson2-6, 1-6
2024-04-05vs St.Rabby55ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesSusan Whitmeyer / Wendy Burkard vs Dana Weiland / Tiffany Harris2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Boole / Susan Dubach vs Averil Glover / Nancy Baird7-6, 6-1
2024-03-22vs Jo.Lake55AWon 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Smith / Mollie Hodl vs Joyce Lake / Tracey Carlin6-0, 6-1
2024-03-01vs St.Rabby55AWon 21
W#1 DoublesMollie Hodl / Cynthia Smith vs Elisabeth Sanchez / Amanda Williams2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Cockrill / Isabelle Homes Gesher vs Michelle Dickson / Dana Weiland0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Boole / Susan Dubach vs Rosemary Peters / Stephanie Rabby4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Mollie Hodl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
3.60
3.56
Carol Lekan
published 4
3.41
Susan Dubach
published
3.28
Holly Camak
published 3.5
3.12
Mary Cockrill
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Wendy Burkard
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.10
Lauren Boole
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Chandler Bastian
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Cockrill + Wendy Burkard3538% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cockrill + Lauren Boole044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mollie Hodl
76W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Elizabeth Hensley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Isabelle Homes Gesher
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Carol Lekan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Susan Dubach
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Holly Camak
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Mary Cockrill
61W–96L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Wendy Burkard
74W–89L career · 7 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Lauren Boole
21W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Chandler Bastian
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.