Teams

Flanagan - Mixed 40s 3.5 Tues

2024 Piedmont Mixed 40 & Over · 3.5 Mixed Dbls Tues PM

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesAshley Fuquay / Emily Wilson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-02vs Kirby - Mixed 40s 3.5 TuesWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Wilson / Jack Walsh vs Peter Meroth / Ginger Hayworth6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-25vs Whichard - Mixed 40+ 3.5 - Tues.Won 10
W#3 DoublesAshley Fuquay / Emily Wilson vs Angela Muller / Michael Muller6-2, 6-2
2024-06-18vs Tapler/OFRC - Mixed 40s 3.5 TuesWon 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Kemp / Emily Wilson vs Chad Davis / Diane Puckett6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / Ashley Fuquay vs Creighton Vaught / Kelley Champion6-4, 6-4
2024-05-28vs Miller - Mixed 40s 3.5 TuesLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / Ashley Fuquay vs Shannon Roley / Kevin Roley5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed Dbls Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Sarah Joplin
published
3.69
Julie Dover
published
3.63
Kevin Dover
published
3.57
Luke Rhoten
published
3.49
Ashley Fuquay
published 3.5
3.47
Jack Walsh
published
3.32
Reeves Rhoten
published
3.30
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.20
Kevin Kemp
published
3.17
Aprille Black
published 3.5
3.08
Thomas Dagger
published
3.04
Emily Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Mary Winstead
published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
published 3
Patrick Flanagan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Dover + Kevin Dover6163% games+8.3% vs expected
Reeves Rhoten + Luke Rhoten7264% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Joplin
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Julie Dover
40W–22L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Kevin Dover
45W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.63
Luke Rhoten
49W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Ashley Fuquay
34W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jack Walsh
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Reeves Rhoten
30W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Kevin Kemp
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Thomas Dagger
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Emily Wilson
178W–123L career · 6 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Winstead
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Patrick Flanagan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.