Teams

MATA/Jonathan Shepherd

2025 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · 4.0 Men Thursday

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-27vs RS-HUNTERWon 21
L#1 DoublesRichard Ricks / Thomas Jarvis vs DeUndre Kellam / Richard Turner1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Dang / Brantley Nicholson vs Michael Mims / Enos Curry6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNoah Goff / Mitch Walker vs CHRISTOPHER HUNTER / Sang Kim7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-20vs HOCO-H. WILSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarry Butler / Phil Hoang vs Trenton Shepherd / Luke Kinser3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrantley Nicholson / Mitch Walker vs Rob Crain / Daniel English6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNoah Goff / Richard Ricks vs Stacy Stephens / Josh Mixon6-2, 6-2
2025-03-13vs MATA/Todd SmithLost 13
L#1 DoublesMitch Walker / Alex Dang vs John Akridge / Scott Bedgood3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Campbell / Ed Mayoralgo vs John Carswell / Frank Seymour2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNoah Goff vs Joseph Summers6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesThomas Jarvis / Jonathan Shepherd vs Frank Jones / Brad Smith1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-06vs RS-HUNTERWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrantley Nicholson / Noah Goff vs Brian Reese / Michael Mims6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFred Otto / Mitch Walker vs Justin Dudas / CHRISTOPHER HUNTER2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTucker Coody / Thomas Jarvis vs Enos Curry / Sang Kim6-3, 7-6
2025-02-27vs HOCO-H. WILSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarry Butler / Brantley Nicholson vs Luke Kinser / Trenton Shepherd6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPhil Hoang / Thomas Jarvis vs Rob Crain / Stacy Stephens3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMitch Walker / Ed Mayoralgo vs Josh Mixon / Brantley Stone3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-02-20vs MATA/Todd SmithSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPhil Hoang / Brantley Nicholson vs John Carswell / Scott Bedgood7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTucker Coody vs Sam O6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Ricks / Barry Butler vs John Akridge / Thomas Driver6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Campbell / Jonathan Shepherd vs Frank Seymour / Caleb Olson0-6, 2-6
2025-02-13vs RS-HUNTERWon 31
W#1 DoublesFred Otto / Noah Goff vs Richard Turner / Daniel Murphy6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPhil Hoang / Richard Ricks vs CHRISTOPHER HUNTER / Justin Dudas6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesBrantley Nicholson vs DeUndre Kellam6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Campbell / Ed Mayoralgo vs Enos Curry / Michael Mims6-7, 1-6
2025-02-06vs HOCO-H. WILSONWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrantley Nicholson / Barry Butler vs Hunter Wilson / Trenton Shepherd6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTucker Coody / Fred Otto vs Stacy Stephens / Josh Mixon6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Jarvis / Jonathan Shepherd vs Greg Smolianinov / Daniel English7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-30vs MATA/Todd SmithLost 13
L#1 DoublesBarry Butler / Phil Hoang vs John Akridge / Scott Bedgood6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlex Dang / Noah Goff vs John Carswell / Frank Jones4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesBrantley Nicholson vs Caleb Olson7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Campbell / Fred Otto vs Mell Merritt / Joseph Summers2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Tucker Coody
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Brantley Nicholson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.82
Barry Butler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Fred Otto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Noah Goff
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Mitch Walker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Richard Ricks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Jonathan Shepherd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Ed Mayoralgo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Jarvis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noah Goff + Fred Otto303 matchesnot enough data
Noah Goff + Barry Butler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tucker Coody
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Brantley Nicholson
20W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Barry Butler
17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Fred Otto
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Noah Goff
20W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Mitch Walker
3W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Richard Ricks
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jonathan Shepherd
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Ed Mayoralgo
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Thomas Jarvis
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.