Teams

Alciatore/18/3.0/CP

2025 NO Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.0 NO (18&O) Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-06vs Colosino/18/3.0/NOD/CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelsi Schmitz / Catherine Lim vs Casey Caldwell / Arrie Henderson6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCatherine Fabre vs Maggie Tarleton4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBurke McFerrin / Lauren Chiu vs Sarah Junius / Kimberly Dominguez7-6, 6-2
2025-04-29vs Hebert/Huete/18/3.0/NOD/CPLost 13
L#1 DoublesLauren Chiu / Kristy Gentry vs Harriet Landrieu / Olivia Orlando2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBurke McFerrin vs Danielle Kuruda6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrianne Whelan / Karen Billeaudeau vs Cynthia Knight / Laura Russo4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSara Reardon / Catherine Fabre vs Joan Hebert / Kelly Waggenspack6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-14vs Ogden/18/3.0/NOD/NOCCWon 32
L#1 DoublesKaren Billeaudeau / Kayla Smith vs Michelle Ogden / Taylor Ambrose6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKristy Gentry vs Jeanne Swingle0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Kang / Kallen Forster vs Holt Kolb / Dorian Stone6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBurke McFerrin vs Logan Senior6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Fabre / Catherine Lim vs Ashley Nesser / Lindsey Schafer6-1, 6-0
2025-04-10vs Dubois/18/3.0/NOD/CPWon 32
L#1 DoublesKristy Gentry / Kayla Smith vs Danah Fisher / Nathalie Dubois3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKallen Forster vs Ann Manuel6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Billeaudeau / Catherine Lim vs Marcie Gardner / Gretchen Pell7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCatherine Fabre vs Sara Algier6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBurke McFerrin / Mari Krane vs Amanda Riso / Cristin Morneau7-5, 6-1
2025-04-01vs Singer/Holder/18/3.0/NOD/AUDLost 23
W#1 DoublesKristy Gentry / Catherine Lim vs Lauren England / Michelle Buras6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBurke McFerrin vs Elizabeth Charvat6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKallen Forster / Victoria Sacco vs Christine Bonnet / Ashley Boisfontaine6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKelsi Schmitz vs Rebekah Teesdale5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Fabre / Brianne Whelan vs Kristen Singer / Alicia Holder6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-17vs EatonNance/18/3.0/NOD/MCCWon 32
W#1 DoublesKallen Forster / Kristy Gentry vs Kathryn Wild / Leslie Moore6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKelsi Schmitz vs Macey Osorno0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Chiu / Lacey Charvet vs Lori Rabito / Kathryn Broussard6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBurke McFerrin vs Ashley Eaton6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSara Reardon / Catherine Fabre vs Bridget Senner / Kathleen Kazour2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-17vs Roberson/18/3.0/NOD/NOLTCWon 50
W#1 DoublesCatherine Lim / Karen Billeaudeau vs Anne Hughs / Marcela Seerman1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKallen Forster vs Carli Simpson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Chiu / Lacey Charvet vs Ann Herren / Lauren Wakeman6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBurke McFerrin vs Bebe Ryan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSara Reardon / Catherine Fabre vs Charlotte Reiss / Neely Griffith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-10vs Worsley/18/3.0/NOD/NOLTCWon 32
W#1 DoublesBurke McFerrin / Lauren Chiu vs Laurel Roberts / Samantha Stokes6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLacey Charvet vs Caroline Young6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMari Krane / Karen Billeaudeau vs Abigail DesHotels / Amy Rougelot6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesVictoria Sacco vs Sarah Worsley6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Fabre / Kayla Smith vs Alicia Higginbotham / Christina Fritchie6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 NO (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kallen Forster
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
3.40
Burke McFerrin
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.35
Victoria Sacco
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Kristy Gentry
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.05
Catherine Lim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.05
Kelsi Schmitz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.93
Lacey Charvet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Brianne Whelan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Catherine Fabre
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.71
Lauren Chiu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Sara Reardon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Mari Krane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Judy Kang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Billeaudeau
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Kayla Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Chiu + Lacey Charvet9954% games+2.4% vs expected
Kristy Gentry + Catherine Lim224 matchesnot enough data
Kallen Forster + Burke McFerrin404 matchesnot enough data
Victoria Sacco + Burke McFerrin303 matchesnot enough data
Karen Billeaudeau + Catherine Lim213 matchesnot enough data
Kelsi Schmitz + Catherine Lim123 matchesnot enough data
Kelsi Schmitz + Burke McFerrin213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Fabre + Sara Reardon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kallen Forster
83W–3L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.73
3.5
Burke McFerrin
77W–14L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Victoria Sacco
30W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Kristy Gentry
25W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3
Catherine Lim
51W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kelsi Schmitz
24W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Lacey Charvet
35W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Brianne Whelan
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Catherine Fabre
8W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Chiu
18W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Sara Reardon
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Mari Krane
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Judy Kang
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karen Billeaudeau
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kayla Smith
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.