Teams

KC-CC YELLOW

2024 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-07vs MVCC GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesRob Pine / Susan Pine vs Elizabeth Sones / Laurence Sones5-7, 4-6
2024-06-30Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Pine / Rob Pine vs Rick Brown / Michelle Brown5-7, 5-7
2024-06-23vs MC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKrystal Joscelyne / Dave Joscelyne vs Amanda Fuller Wellman / Todd Wellman1-6, 1-6
2024-06-16vs LEBTC GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKrystal Joscelyne / Dave Joscelyne vs Dorothy Carr / Jason Carr2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Pine / Rob Pine vs Kathy Dudek / Joseph Dudek4-6, 2-6
2024-06-09vs SS-LGT YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesKrystal Joscelyne / Dave Joscelyne vs Adrienne Bivens / Garrett Tripp3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRob Pine / Susan Pine vs Lindsey McGraw / Patrick McGraw1-6, 1-6
2024-06-02vs MVCC GREENSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKrystal Joscelyne / Dave Joscelyne vs Tara McEnroe / Rob Brine4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Pine / Rob Pine vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-26vs NJ PURPLELost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Pine / Rob Pine vs Maggie Gomer / Scott Gomer1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Robert Mason
published
3.25
Kelly Fisher
published
3.21
Dave Joscelyne
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Erin Mason
published
2.82
Rob Pine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Susan Pine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Krystal Joscelyne
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Vicki Calabro
published
Christopher Calabro
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Mason + Erin Mason12361% games+13.6% vs expected
Krystal Joscelyne + Dave Joscelyne222051% games+11.5% vs expected
Susan Pine + Rob Pine113037% games−5.2% vs expected
Vicki Calabro + Christopher Calabro0543% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Mason
34W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
Kelly Fisher
32W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Dave Joscelyne
60W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Erin Mason
51W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.15
3
Rob Pine
39W–53L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Susan Pine
40W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Krystal Joscelyne
69W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Vicki Calabro
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Christopher Calabro
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.