Teams

CROWN RED

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-12vs HMTC ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Carmen Kilday / Suzanne Hale6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Lambert / Teresa Weinstein vs Kaili Young / Jennifer Wiley6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Laurie Feler vs Gail Draper / Kim Phillips6-1, 6-3
2025-07-12vs MEMPK BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Lambert / Teresa Weinstein vs Sue Barone / Allyson McCale6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Janet Leverson vs Deborah Jones / Judy Flaherty4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Shook / Nancy Zeigel vs Vicky Mediate / Jill Hanafee6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-11vs MEMPK BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Kimberly Davis / Lisa Damico Anderson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Feler / Janet Leverson vs Vicky Mediate / Irene Babcock6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Lambert / Teresa Weinstein vs Allyson McCale / Vickie Smith6-1, 6-0
2025-07-11vs HMTC ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Lambert / Laurie Feler vs Mitzi Johnson / Suzanne Hale6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Carmen Kilday / Kimberly Tomlinson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Janet Leverson vs Gail Draper / Amy Berkner6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Sarah Shook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.28
Laurie Feler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Janet Leverson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.66
Nancy Zeigel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Karen Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Teresa Weinstein
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Leverson + Nancy Zeigel2442% games−1.7% vs expected
Teresa Weinstein + Nancy Zeigel7068% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Feler + Karen Lambert5073% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Shook + Karen Lambert314 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Weinstein + Karen Lambert303 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Zeigel + Karen Lambert033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sarah Shook
36W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Laurie Feler
47W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Janet Leverson
37W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Nancy Zeigel
63W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
Karen Lambert
14W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Weinstein
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.