Teams

Fiddlers Creek - D.Keely

2023 Collier Mixed 55 & Over Fall · 2023 Mixed 55 & over 7.0 Fall

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-10vs Fall Winners/ Marco YMCA - GauchLost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Kaylor / Tina Jaquess vs Cheryl Solimine / Ben Yocom3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-11-26vs Players Club - K. KellyLost 01
L#1 DoublesTina Jaquess / Jonathan Kaylor vs Karen Kelly / Hans Vriens6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-11-13vs Cambier - ConroySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Garrett / Peggy Keigley vs Cheryl Rauch / Joe Kentfield3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTina Jaquess / Jonathan Kaylor vs Caroline Rogers / John Friend6-1, 6-2
2022-11-05vs Players Club - K. KellyWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarco Arilli / Tina Jaquess vs Frank Ciriello / Crystie Ciriello6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark Garrett / Peggy Keigley vs Jim Baker / Elaine Leffingwell-King6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Kaylor / Tina Jaquess vs Pamela Conger / William de Brun6-1, 6-1
2022-10-22vs Fall Winners/ Marco YMCA - GauchWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Kaylor / Tina Jaquess vs Stephanie Opel / David Ceryak6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 Mixed 55 & over 7.0 Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
David Keely
published 3.5
3.27
Mary Defalco
published
3.24
Tina Jaquess
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Linda Keely
published
3.10
Victoria Pollock
published
Jonathan Kaylor
published
Marco Arilli
published
Mark Garrett
published
Peggy Keigley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Stan Britton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Keely + David Keely2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Keely
32W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Mary Defalco
28W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Tina Jaquess
105W–80L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jonathan Kaylor
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marco Arilli
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Garrett
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peggy Keigley
92W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stan Britton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.