Teams

*2-JRoss-Eno

2024 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-29vs *1-GSmith-HRSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Donna Bauman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLina Habib vs Beth Huebner3-6, 6-7
2024-07-15vs *3-KLeib-EnoLost 12
L#1 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Allison Dean3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesStacey Burkert vs Cheryl Reid6-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMaya Hahn vs Katherine Leib6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-08vs *1-GSmith-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesValerie Acre vs Julia Howard0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMaya Hahn vs Leslie Boesch3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesStacey Burkert vs Geraldine Smith2-6, 6-7
2024-06-24vs *3-KLeib-EnoLost 12
L#1 SinglesNeeta Vora vs Cheryl Reid4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesValerie Acre vs Allison Dean2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Cristina Smith6-3, 6-2
2024-06-17vs *1-GSmith-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesValerie Acre vs Julia Howard0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLina Habib vs Leslie Boesch0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Donna Bauman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-06-11vs *3-KLeib-EnoLost 12
L#1 SinglesNeeta Vora vs Allison Dean3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Kim El6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesLina Habib vs Maureen Sredl7-5, 7-6
2024-06-03vs *3-KLeib-EnoWon 30
W#1 SinglesMaya Hahn vs Chace Ogle6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Maureen Sredl7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Cristina Smith6-0, 6-0
2024-05-20vs *1-GSmith-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesStacey Burkert vs Julia Howard1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Leslie Boesch0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Amy Beth Kessinger3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Neeta Vora
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Valerie Acre
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.91
Stacey Burkert
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.83
Tiffany Langino
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.82
Maya Hahn
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.80
Lina Habib
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.78
Justyne Ross
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.70
Hannah Silverstein
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4
3.64
Heidi Ross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justyne Ross + Valerie Acre12353% games+1.0% vs expected
Lina Habib + Justyne Ross2352% gamesnot enough data
Maya Hahn + Valerie Acre314 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Ross + Tiffany Langino224 matchesnot enough data
Justyne Ross + Neeta Vora213 matchesnot enough data
Justyne Ross + Stacey Burkert123 matchesnot enough data
Neeta Vora + Stacey Burkert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Neeta Vora
115W–71L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4
Valerie Acre
129W–56L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Stacey Burkert
175W–116L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Tiffany Langino
244W–125L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Maya Hahn
61W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Lina Habib
38W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Justyne Ross
145W–117L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Hannah Silverstein
67W–104L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Heidi Ross
33W–25L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.