Teams

2*ROakley-EV

2024 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-30vs 4*DNagelhout-HSWon 10
W#1 SinglesTom Luben vs Brent Fox6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-15Lost 01
L#2 SinglesReggie Oakley vs Jeremy Trantham2-6, 1-6
2024-07-01vs 3*RMcGarrah-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesTom Luben vs James Bowers6-4, 7-5
W#3 SinglesReggie Oakley vs Matt Williamson6-4, 6-4
2024-06-24vs 4*DNagelhout-HSSplit 11
L#2 SinglesReggie Oakley vs Dirk Kumashiro1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesTom Luben vs Russell Davis6-2, 6-4
2024-06-10vs 3*RMcGarrah-HRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTom Luben vs Michael Andre3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesReggie Oakley vs John Harlow6-3, 6-2
2024-06-03vs 4*DNagelhout-HSWon 20
W#1 SinglesTom Luben vs Thomas Rexrode6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesReggie Oakley vs Russell Davis7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Chris Reeves
published 3.5
3.15
Bart Smith
published 3.5
2.79
Tom Luben
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.73
Ryan Boyles
published
2.69
Reggie Oakley
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
Lee Goldberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reggie Oakley + Tom Luben3347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Reeves
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Bart Smith
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Tom Luben
85W–115L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Ryan Boyles
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Reggie Oakley
56W–103L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Lee Goldberg
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.