Teams

Klocek/18s/5.5/PAC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

16 players · average NTRP 2.62 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ariana Petrell-thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Emily Cristina
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.65
Ellen Sweetman
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
2.40
Brittany Hesch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.33
Chelsea Clement
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.33
Addie Troxclair
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Klocek
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Jennifer Steen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Joelle Cuevas
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Katie DiMaria
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kay Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lauren Tagesen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Nela Otero
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Taylor Roessler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Toria Brown
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Addie Troxclair + Jennifer Steen4164% gamesnot enough data
Chelsea Clement + Elizabeth Klocek213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Klocek + Kay Byrd033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ariana Petrell-thomas
12W–2L career · type D · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Emily Cristina
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Ellen Sweetman
20W–32L career · 20 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
2.5
Brittany Hesch
6W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Chelsea Clement
10W–15L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Addie Troxclair
14W–12L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Elizabeth Klocek
8W–18L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Steen
11W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joelle Cuevas
26W–29L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie DiMaria
8W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kay Byrd
7W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Tagesen
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa McCoy
5W–12L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nela Otero
3W–17L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Roessler
7W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Toria Brown
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.