Teams

KNO RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-18vs CCC TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelly Lownsberry / Joane Keran vs Melita Faith / Betsy McCain3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBarb Richards vs Jill Roos1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLucy Floyd / Kim Haverly vs Robyn Tripp / Jill Schrader6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Webster / Beth Cooper vs Mikelle Smith / Christie Heller7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-11vs PH REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLucy Floyd / Kim Haverly vs Simne Langton / Noel Litchkowski4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Zenk / Megan Finesilver vs Kristin McDonald / Rebecca Grace3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Cooper / Jane Webster vs Brenna Mielenz / Kimberly Miller4-6, 1-6
2024-07-05vs HRCA-N REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Lownsberry / Elizabeth Zenk vs Danielle Butler / Amy Keller6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJoane Keran vs Carey Madsen2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarb Richards / Megan Finesilver vs Heather Coker / Carrie Erickson2-6, 2-6
2024-06-27vs KC-RH TEALLost 04
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Zenk / Megan Finesilver vs Lauren Plain / Janet Weyhmiller3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Hayes vs Christy Dobson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJane Webster / Joane Keran vs Alyssa Elmore / Christie Weber2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Cooper / Barb Richards vs Julie Hobart / Heather Miner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-20vs SS-LGT NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Zenk / Kelly Lownsberry vs Karen Knight / Sharon Johnson0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJoane Keran vs Rachel Feiman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJane Webster / Kim Haverly vs Valerie Norris / Patty Weston2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Cooper / Barb Richards vs Mary Berg / Rhonda Struman6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-13vs LEBTC NAVYWon 31
L#1 DoublesBeth Cooper / Megan Finesilver vs Fauna MacKillip / Allison Langenderfer3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Lownsberry vs Kathryn Ross6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLucy Floyd / Kim Haverly vs Jane Braaten / Marcy Butler6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJane Webster / Kelly Hayes vs Stephanie Lanziner / Kim Belitz7-5, 7-5
2024-06-06vs KC-CC NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelly Lownsberry / Elizabeth Zenk vs Crystal Adams / Ann Rhoads3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Finesilver vs Kelly Fisher5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLucy Floyd / Beth Cooper vs Corinne Kesner / Lynn Adams2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJane Webster / Kelly Hayes vs Jeanette Simenson-Gurolnick / Nelisha Firestone3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Megan Finesilver
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Kelly Lownsberry
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Kim Haverly
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Elizabeth Zenk
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Kelly Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.91
Beth Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.88
Lucy Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Barb Richards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Jane Webster
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Joane Keran
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Zenk + Kim Haverly5354% games+7.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Zenk + Joane Keran12856% games+4.5% vs expected
Kelly Lownsberry + Jane Webster1538% games+3.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Zenk + Kelly Lownsberry4448% games+3.3% vs expected
Lucy Floyd + Kelly Lownsberry3248% games+2.5% vs expected
Kelly Hayes + Jane Webster7351% games+0.8% vs expected
Kim Haverly + Joane Keran3250% games+0.8% vs expected
Kim Haverly + Lucy Floyd6847% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Megan Finesilver
51W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Kelly Lownsberry
108W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kim Haverly
75W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Elizabeth Zenk
174W–106L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Kelly Hayes
11W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.05
3.5
Beth Cooper
37W–76L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Lucy Floyd
49W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Barb Richards
107W–85L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Jane Webster
68W–125L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
Joane Keran
27W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.