Teams

STL-REG-Blake

Adult 55 & Over August 5-7, 2022 · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA-REG-Wilkinson:000000
2HOA-REG-Herman/55&Over7.0W000000
3KS-REG-Rinehart/55&Over7.0W000000
4MO-Reg-Young/55&Over7.0W000000
5NE-REG-Doghman000000
6OK-Reg-Casey/Johnston000000
7STL-REG-Blake000000
8IAWC-Thompson-Oster/55&Over7.0W000000
9STLWC/Uelhof-Shadburne/55&Over7.0W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Joyce Jackson
published
3.49
Margaret West
published
3.32
Mary Reitz
published
Amy Santangelo
published 3.5
Beverly Menendez
published 3.5
3.15
Margaret Wright
published
3.05
Susan Blake
published
2.92
Rhonda Kannapel
published
Jacqueline Short
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret West + Mary Reitz13361% games+3.6% vs expected
Susan Blake + Mary Reitz7156% games+2.5% vs expected
Mary Reitz + Rhonda Kannapel21958% games−1.6% vs expected
Beverly Menendez + Rhonda Kannapel4553% games−9.8% vs expected
Susan Blake + Beverly Menendez3346% gamesnot enough data
Susan Blake + Rhonda Kannapel1442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Jackson
119W–77L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Margaret West
85W–79L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
Mary Reitz
202W–97L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Amy Santangelo
15W–34L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Beverly Menendez
65W–63L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Wright
80W–154L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Susan Blake
64W–88L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Rhonda Kannapel
68W–61L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
Jacqueline Short
40W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.