Teams

APR BLUE

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-23vs CM BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGarrett Breazeale / Nick Adams vs Steven Tamez / Alex Lomas6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJack Fleischmann vs Brendan Charles4-6, 0-6
2021-08-16vs SKY GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNick Adams / Garrett Breazeale vs Dan Almuti / David Marom6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJack Fleischmann vs Douglas Poirier6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2021-08-09vs CACM GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNick Adams / Josh Millard vs Jim Gordon / Mark Robertson6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJack Fleischmann / Garrett Breazeale vs Jarrid DeMaio / Peter Graham4-6, 2-6
2021-08-02vs WP BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesNick Adams / Josh Millard vs Nick Nyffeler / Shawn Weidert0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGarrett Breazeale vs Frankie Newman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBryan Adams / Jack Fleischmann vs Mark Anderson / Talwin Filholm0-6, 2-6
2021-07-26vs SKY NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesNick Adams / Josh Millard vs Elmo Morales / Steve Ferris4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGarrett Breazeale vs Scott Kline2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBryan Adams / Jack Fleischmann vs Scott Hermansen / Chad Cleveland1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SKY NAVY5214716160
2CR BLUE5214717148
3CCC GREEN5213819175
4BCST ORANGE43111022192
5WC PURPLE43101124199
6HV NAVY43111025181
7TTA ORANGE339918149
8CACI GREY34101125183
9VC BLACK2571430203
10BCST NAVY1631838237
11APR BLUE0731836227

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bryan Adams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Garrett Breazeale
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Jack Fleischmann
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Josh Millard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Adams + Josh Millard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Bryan Adams
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Garrett Breazeale
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jack Fleischmann
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Josh Millard
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nick Adams
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.