Teams

EDG-Edgebrook Edge-Kirkegaard

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.58 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-19vs AYTC-BauerLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaprice Pine / Gesina Howard vs Jennifer Heydt / Heather Bauer0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Lew / Rebecca Peck vs Jen Pham-Corbett / Jenny Ott0-6, 0-6
2022-02-26vs AYTC-South End Ladies Dubs-ZimmerLost 12
W#1 DoublesSheila Kirkegaard / Mihaela Olariu Ureche vs Amanda McKay / Mary Casey2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNatalie Banks vs Adora Moncada4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Remedios / Rebecca Peck vs Rebecca Zimmer / Kristen Modie2-6, 1-6
2022-02-20vs WSC-Raquettes-OnuLost 12
W#1 DoublesMihaela Olariu Ureche / Natalie Banks vs Virginia Onu / Alina Bibireata6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSeungwon Lee vs Irina Salvan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Askilsrud / Gesina Howard vs Maria Smintina / Anca Zaharia4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-11vs TCSP-DavisLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila Kirkegaard / Seungwon Lee vs Shannon Garbaccio / Alysson Bashey2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMihaela Olariu Ureche vs Mayumi Willgerodt0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Remedios / Tracy Askilsrud vs Nancy Danoff / Hillary Peterman1-6, 1-6
2022-02-05vs CAC/SL-Bet-on-our-courtWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuisa Gass / Mihaela Olariu Ureche vs Carisa Betancourt / Vandella Stewart6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSheila Kirkegaard vs Elena Dvornaya6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSeungwon Lee / Rebecca Peck vs Andrea Barraclough / Louise Radtke2-6, 5-7
2022-01-28vs TCSP-SpainLost 12
W#1 DoublesNatalie Banks / Caprice Pine vs Rhenda Meiser / Erin Oest-Larsen6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLuisa Gass vs Nari Benson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGesina Howard / Nicole Lew vs Monica Spain / Leona Zamora2-6, 4-6
2022-01-22vs RTC-English-Group TherapyLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaprice Pine / Natalie Banks vs Debara Ferleman / Rebecca Buxbaum6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSheila Kirkegaard vs Kaori Yamada4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRebecca Peck / Natalie Remedios vs Cristi Rivas / Julia Boneva0-6, 0-6
2022-01-16vs BC-Hot Shots-UnderwoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuisa Gass / Seungwon Lee vs Eunice Cho / Amy King4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMihaela Olariu Ureche vs Jennifer Strelow6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGesina Howard / Tracy Askilsrud vs MOLLY KUFFNER / Annette Defigueiredo4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RTC-English-Group Therapy7119512167
2MI-Always be closing-Lee7220716161
3CP-TNT-Wang7219820187
4TCSP-Davis6216822214
5BC-Double Trouble-Carlisle63131430245
6AYTC-Bauer5315921184
7AYTC-South End Ladies Dubs-Zimmer53131126221
8AYTC-40/Love-Campos54161124217
9BAIN-Bainbridge Isle Fairies-Kellett45111637275
10WSC-Raquettes-Onu35101429226
11BC-Hot Shots-Underwood3571738258
12AYTC-Steck36101735255
13HBSQ-Yeigh36111638280
14CAC/SL-Bet-on-our-court2691534251
15MC-Holden27101738264
16EDG-Edgebrook Edge-Kirkegaard1771736226
17FC-Good Gets-Sheffield1872043299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Mihaela Olariu Ureche
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.39
Seungwon Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.32
Sheila Kirkegaard
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Luisa Gass
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.16
Gesina Howard
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.12
Nicole Lew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Caprice Pine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Natalie Banks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Natalie Remedios
published
Rebecca Peck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy Askilsrud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mihaela Olariu Ureche + Luisa Gass5453% games+7.0% vs expected
Tracy Askilsrud + Gesina Howard1546% gamesnot enough data
Mihaela Olariu Ureche + Caprice Pine314 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Kirkegaard + Luisa Gass303 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Kirkegaard + Caprice Pine033 matchesnot enough data
Luisa Gass + Seungwon Lee033 matchesnot enough data
Gesina Howard + Nicole Lew213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Peck + Seungwon Lee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mihaela Olariu Ureche
79W–78L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
2.5
Seungwon Lee
34W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%80%20%
2.39
2.5
Sheila Kirkegaard
51W–109L career · 8 lines in 2022
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Luisa Gass
19W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Gesina Howard
20W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Nicole Lew
18W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.12
0
Caprice Pine
21W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Banks
12W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Remedios
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Peck
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Askilsrud
4W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.