Teams

CSRC SIEGAL

2021 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-10vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERLost 01
L#2 DoublesLori McPherson / Kady Hommel vs Judy Flaherty / Rebecca Martin1-6, 2-6
2021-06-03vs PBTC HENSONWon 10
W#1 DoublesKady Hommel / Roni Schlagel vs Julie Larson / Paula Henson7-5, 6-3
2021-05-27vs MEMPK PLUMMERWon 10
W#2 DoublesKady Hommel / Lori McPherson vs Kimberly Peterson / Terri Plummer5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Jackson / Kady Hommel vs Karen Henderson / Lyn Kerker6-1, 6-3
2021-05-13vs FLYHS SAXBYWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatty Carpenter / Kady Hommel vs Amy Saxby / Chelsey Wright6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kady Hommel
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Nancy Siegel
published
3.67
Patty Carpenter
published
3.30
Stephanie Brock
published
3.29
Vincenta van Every
published
3.24
Lori McPherson
published
Roni Schlagel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roni Schlagel + Nancy Siegel281058% games+5.0% vs expected
Lori McPherson + Kady Hommel4545% games+0.4% vs expected
Patty Carpenter + Nancy Siegel3445% games−8.3% vs expected
Patty Carpenter + Kady Hommel2344% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Siegel + Kady Hommel314 matchesnot enough data
Lori McPherson + Vincenta van Every033 matchesnot enough data
Roni Schlagel + Kady Hommel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kady Hommel
102W–88L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Nancy Siegel
83W–46L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Patty Carpenter
46W–60L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.67
Stephanie Brock
57W–29L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Vincenta van Every
41W–39L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Lori McPherson
25W–38L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Roni Schlagel
50W–32L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.