Teams

Titans

2024 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-02vs Game TimeWon 20
W#1 DoublesErik Jahreskog / Fabian Scheifele vs Soheil Shirzadi / Juan Jose Tijero6-3, 5-4
W#2 DoublesScott Gelbman / Blake Nuwayhid vs Kenny Callender / Derrick Lewis6-4, 3-4
2024-05-18vs Net AssetsLost 02
L#1 DoublesErik Jahreskog / Blake Nuwayhid vs Luis Giraldo / Matthew Christian2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesThomas Jeffers vs Thomas McGuire4-6, 2-6
2024-05-12vs Net AssetsLost 13
W#1 DoublesMark Cassell / Daniel Gendler vs Damani Eubanks / Joseph Awadalla3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFabian Scheifele vs Thomas McGuire4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Jones / Brad Thomas vs Elliott Datlow / NEERAV GANJOO1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesScott Gelbman / Blake Nuwayhid vs Matthew Christian / Kirby Mayo3-6, 5-7
2024-05-11vs Heavy HittersLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Gelbman / Blake Nuwayhid vs Frank Fortunati / Vivek Hariharan2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesFabian Scheifele vs Brian Randolph2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesThomas Jeffers vs Shashwat Lal1-6, 4-6
2024-04-28vs Heavy HittersLost 03
L#1 DoublesBlake Nuwayhid / Brad Thomas vs RICARDO DURAN / Tyler Ault2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesFabian Scheifele vs Jeremy Mancus1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Jeffers / Daniel Gendler vs Ryan Fischbach / Frank Fortunati4-6, 6-6
2024-04-21vs Game TimeWon 21
L#1 DoublesChase Pipkin / Brad Thomas vs Abdoul Miloud Agbere / Soheil Shirzadi3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBlake Nuwayhid / Scott Gelbman vs Byron Levy / Derrick Lewis6-3, 5-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Jones / Thomas Jeffers vs Timothy Effio / Juan Jose Tijero6-3, 5-6
2024-04-15vs Heavy HittersLost 04
L#1 DoublesDaniel Gendler / Scott Gelbman vs Todd Campbell / Ryan Fischbach0-1
L#1 SinglesErik Jahreskog vs Brian Randolph0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLohit Palle / Blake Nuwayhid vs Barghav Hariharan / Tyler Ault1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesFabian Scheifele vs Mark Motta5-7, 2-0
2024-04-07vs Game TimeLost 03
L#1 DoublesBlake Nuwayhid / Erik Jahreskog vs Zackery Gould / Roderick Peyton3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDaniel Gendler vs Thomas Cyrnak4-6, 6-5
L#2 SinglesThomas Jeffers vs Rohan Raikar0-6, 3-6
2024-04-06vs Net AssetsLost 04
L#1 DoublesErik Jahreskog / Fabian Scheifele vs Aravind Krishna / Joseph Awadalla6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesThomas Jeffers vs NEERAV GANJOO2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChase Pipkin / Daniel Jones vs Thomas McGuire / Ian Lucas2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrad Thomas / Mark Cassell vs James O'Neill / Kirby Mayo2-6, 4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Heavy Hitters0936923272
2Titans0963977499

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.19
Scott Gelbman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.13
Daniel Gendler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Blake Nuwayhid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
Chase Pipkin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Daniel Jones
published 4
Erik Jahreskog
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Fabian Scheifele
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lohit Palle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Cassell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Jeffers
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Gelbman + Blake Nuwayhid71344% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brad Thomas
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Scott Gelbman
73W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Daniel Gendler
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Blake Nuwayhid
32W–61L career · 8 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
Chase Pipkin
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Daniel Jones
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Erik Jahreskog
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Fabian Scheifele
1W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lohit Palle
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mark Cassell
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Jeffers
7W–10L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.