Teams

De Silva/Callen

2023 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Callen Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.13
Kim Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Melanie DeSilva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2023-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Christensen / Melanie DeSilva vs Tracey Hodgson / Rachel Young2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Kim Christensen vs Kaie Wellman / Ann Arp6-3, 6-1
2023-08-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Christensen / Melanie DeSilva vs Maryam Farinola / Vivian Nguyen7-6, 6-1
2023-07-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Callen Sterling - (DQ) vs Michele Desmarais / Barbara Gram6-0, 6-2
2023-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Callen Sterling - (DQ) vs Karen Barks / Cynthia Novac-Yu6-4, 6-2
2023-06-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Callen Sterling - (DQ) vs Sara Crate / Katie Jurgenson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Callen Sterling - (DQ) vs Dolores Corley / Laura Rundle6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Callen Sterling
72W–23L career
0%83%17%
3.99
3.5
Kim Christensen
41W–43L career
17%82%1%
3.13
3.5
Melanie DeSilva
46W–38L career · type A
10%90%0%
3.12

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.