Teams

CTL55/Connare/RK

Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Mixed 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55 & Over Mixed 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Michael Beam
published
3.12
Trey Spong
published
3.11
Janet Jeter
published
2.96
Caroline Connare
published 3
2.71
Ann Marie Mims
published 3
2.67
Carleen Smoak
published 3
2.64
Allen Smoak
published 3
2.62
Patricia Earle
published
2.60
Thad Cleary
published
2.58
LynAnne Knudsen
published
2.56
Donnie Mims
published
2.55
Lyssa Fisher
published
2.50
Becky Hunter
published 3
2.09
Dianne Woodcock
published 3
Pamela Scott
published
Sallie Noble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carleen Smoak + Allen Smoak1538% gamesnot enough data
Sallie Noble + Michael Beam134 matchesnot enough data
Donnie Mims + Lyssa Fisher033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Beam
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Trey Spong
41W–36L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Janet Jeter
33W–69L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Caroline Connare
138W–122L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Ann Marie Mims
54W–84L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Carleen Smoak
69W–60L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Allen Smoak
7W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64
Patricia Earle
65W–117L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Thad Cleary
38W–32L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
LynAnne Knudsen
53W–96L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
2.58
Donnie Mims
10W–25L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
Lyssa Fisher
57W–82L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Becky Hunter
55W–60L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Dianne Woodcock
18W–57L career · type A · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.09
Pamela Scott
27W–51L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sallie Noble
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.