Teams

SLammers

2025 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-23vs Triple the FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly Lammers / Earline Racoma vs Akiko Oshiro / Shaina Yeung5-7, 2-6
2025-08-09vs Deuces WilderWon 10
W#1 DoublesRaimi Okazaki / Andrea Yamato vs Diana Seppelfrick / Lori Chang6-1, 6-0
2025-08-02vs Ace Ace In Your FaceLost 01
L#1 DoublesRaimi Okazaki / Sheila Kurosu vs Haley Fujimori / Caasi Nakasone2-6, 2-6
2025-07-26vs KRC Summer CampLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Yamato / Raimi Okazaki vs Jane Schumacker / Sophia Storch7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-19vs Triple the FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesEarline Racoma / Sheila Kurosu vs Jennifer Day / Melissa Ching2-6, 1-6
2025-07-06vs Deuces WilderWon 10
W#1 DoublesMolly Lammers / Raimi Okazaki vs Diana Seppelfrick / Noel Salter6-2, 6-3
2025-06-29vs Ace Ace In Your FaceLost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly Lammers / Earline Racoma vs Reina Visaya / Aureana Wong2-6, 1-6
2025-06-22vs KRC Summer CampWon 10
W#1 DoublesRaimi Okazaki / Andrea Yamato vs Katelyn Sweeney Ching / Jane Schumacker6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ace Ace In Your Face7171350
2Triple the Fun5353764
3KRC Summer Camp5353967
4SLammers35351177
5Deuces Wilder08081694

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Raimi Okazaki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Molly Lammers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Andrea Yamato
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Earline Racoma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Sheila Kurosu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Yamato + Raimi Okazaki6749% games−3.5% vs expected
Raimi Okazaki + Molly Lammers314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Raimi Okazaki
64W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Molly Lammers
81W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Andrea Yamato
60W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Earline Racoma
45W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Sheila Kurosu
23W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.