Teams

Peak-Enyeart

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 WOMEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-19vs HRSC-BogardWon 30
W#1 DoublesNaticia Litven / Ginny Mahl vs Jill Spaulding / Melanie Finstad6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesValerie Garcia / Denise Mai vs Sydney Ihde / Kathryn Bustle6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiz Enyeart / Mary Rawlsky vs Maureen Busby / Tammy Carter5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-18vs EW-PFC-CremersLost 12
W#1 DoublesWendy Teets / Liz Enyeart vs Karen Mathews / Marie Fitzpatrick6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Jordahl / Lea Williams vs Rene Reighard / Laura Cremers3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Mahl / Naticia Litven vs Tracie Kuka / Pauli Martin6-7, 5-7
2025-10-18vs PFC-Central Park Fit HagenLost 12
W#1 DoublesValerie Garcia / Denise Mai vs Kimberly Bayley / Janie Slater7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLiz Enyeart / Wendy Teets vs Elaine Kelley / Merri Wells3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLea Williams / Mary Rawlsky vs Marlaine Moore / Jlynn Spitz3-6, 1-6
2025-10-17vs CBRC-Sweet and SassyWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Mai / Wendy Teets vs Lynne Roeder / Debbie Bampton6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLiz Enyeart / Mary Rawlsky vs Sarah Miller / Rise Hawley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Jordahl / Lea Williams vs Val Otto / Signe White6-3, 6-2
2025-10-17vs HRSC-DeyWon 21
L#1 DoublesValerie Garcia / Denise Mai vs Courtenay Dey / Michele Dearing2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Jordahl / Wendy Teets vs Kristen Towell / Michele Beaman7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLiz Enyeart / Mary Rawlsky vs Lori Robertson / Leslie Jones6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Wendy Teets
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Denise Mai
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Valerie Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Mary Rawlsky
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Lea Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dawn Mehra
published 3.5
Ginny Mahl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Laura Jordahl
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Liz Enyeart
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Naticia Litven
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Teets + Denise Mai13363% games+9.2% vs expected
Laura Jordahl + Wendy Teets7353% games+8.8% vs expected
Liz Enyeart + Wendy Teets9555% games+3.8% vs expected
Denise Mai + Valerie Garcia192048% games−4.2% vs expected
Liz Enyeart + Laura Jordahl9556% gamesnot enough data
Mary Rawlsky + Valerie Garcia2445% gamesnot enough data
Liz Enyeart + Mary Rawlsky314 matchesnot enough data
Liz Enyeart + Lea Williams213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Teets
36W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Denise Mai
42W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Valerie Garcia
44W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.62
Mary Rawlsky
14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Lea Williams
19W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Dawn Mehra
6W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Ginny Mahl
11W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Jordahl
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Liz Enyeart
40W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Naticia Litven
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.