Teams

DRusnak 3.0

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-27vs JWOLBORSKY SUMMER SINGLESWon 10
W#2 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Michelle Staub6-4, 7-5
2022-07-19Split 11
L#2 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Kristen Harris3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAshley Lindeman vs Mary Elizabeth Miller6-1, 6-2
2022-06-22vs LCOXLost 02
L#1 SinglesAshley Lindeman vs Ann Skvarcius1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Sheila Breckenridge0-6, 0-6
2022-06-20vs SOverholserLost 02
L#1 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Ann Garey2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Jill Cramer3-3
2022-06-15vs BWilhelm 3.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Skylar Poole0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAshley Lindeman vs Silpa Yalamanchili1-6, 1-6
2022-06-01vs S. White/ERCWon 20
W#1 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Stacie White6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Kacey Barcliff6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Amy Cagle
published 3
2.71
Jade Paunovich
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.67
Ashley Lindeman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Natalie Norris
published
2.54
Dawn Rusnak
usually #2 Singles 86%, also #3 Singles 14% · published 3
2.40
Brittany Shumaker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.28
Leigh Baxter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Rusnak + Jade Paunovich6549% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Lindeman + Brittany Shumaker5454% gamesnot enough data
Jade Paunovich + Brittany Shumaker1631% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Lindeman + Natalie Norris0532% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Cagle
17W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Jade Paunovich
85W–180L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Ashley Lindeman
45W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.67
Natalie Norris
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Dawn Rusnak
134W–126L career · 7 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Brittany Shumaker
46W–81L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.40
Leigh Baxter
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%95%5%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.