Teams

CVTA GREY

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 4.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-02vs BRMST REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesRajeev Anki / Pranav Barve vs Alex Pedersen / Spencer Bouck6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKeaton Howe / Tam Nong vs Michael Bombulie / John Black6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTrevor Updegraff / Graham Johnson vs John Hamill / Stephen Pola7-6, 6-0
2023-06-01vs MEA NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesPranav Barve / Tam Nong vs Brian MacMillan / Mark Buzek6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKeaton Howe / Trevor Updegraff vs Scott Burridge / Andrew Smith5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-27vs BTA-CU ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesConnor Buchanan / Keaton Howe vs Matt Miller / Eric Maier4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPranav Barve / Tam Nong vs Craig Hoeltgen / AJ Johnson6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2023-05-23vs MEA PURPLELost 01
L#2 DoublesAndy Antos / Trevor Updegraff vs Michael Winters / Steve Sims5-7, 3-6
2023-05-07vs TTA-E REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTam Nong / Pranav Barve vs Ryan Pelton / Brian Loflin6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKeaton Howe / Connor Buchanan vs Ian Harris / Philip Dixon-Patterson7-5, 7-5
2023-05-04vs LTA-Q BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndy Antos / Pranav Barve vs Michael Gugliotto / David Riffel6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKeaton Howe / Tam Nong vs Judson Smith / Mark Hinman6-2, 6-4
2023-05-03vs RMTC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndy Antos / Trevor Updegraff vs Robert Horansky / Doug Kazarosian6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTam Nong / Pranav Barve vs Julien Denat / Louis Amundson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKeaton Howe / Brian Carlson vs Logan Eckert / Seth Chernoff6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Connor Buchanan
published 5
4.30
Pranav Barve
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Andy Antos
published 4.5
4.21
Trevor Updegraff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
Keaton Howe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Brian Carlson
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pranav Barve + Keaton Howe2342% gamesnot enough data
Trevor Updegraff + Keaton Howe134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Connor Buchanan
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.40
4.5
Pranav Barve
24W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Andy Antos
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Trevor Updegraff
45W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Keaton Howe
35W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Brian Carlson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.