Teams

Smith/Wilson/Knoxville

2023 Combo 40 & Over- Knoxville · 6.5 40 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-07vs Martin/Knox/TNWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaila Yoder / Emily Elison vs Angie Epps / Libby Hicks6-0, 6-2
2023-09-30vs Wentz/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Elison / Laila Yoder vs Nancy Wentz / Shelly Ren7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-09-18vs Martin/Knox/TNWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Elison / Laila Yoder vs Amanda Martin / Sandy Garrard6-1, 6-4
2023-09-11vs Wentz/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Elison / Pearl Jhala vs Stacey Wright / Claudia Stallings6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Emily Elison
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Rita Thome
published
3.30
Kelly Hollingsworth
published
3.29
Kristin Monge
published
3.24
Laila Yoder
published
3.20
Keri Root
published
3.12
Pearl Jhala
published
3.11
Amber McGhee
published 3.5
3.10
Gina Hovis
published 3.5
3.00
Leslie Lischer
published
2.75
Shannon Thackston
published
Jodi Pike
published
Mariya Zhuravleva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Monge + Emily Elison8067% games+7.8% vs expected
Gina Hovis + Leslie Lischer101446% games+3.6% vs expected
Gina Hovis + Rita Thome6554% games−0.7% vs expected
Gina Hovis + Keri Root3247% gamesnot enough data
Rita Thome + Keri Root213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Hollingsworth + Emily Elison123 matchesnot enough data
Amber McGhee + Keri Root213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Elison + Laila Yoder213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Elison
172W–110L career · 9 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Rita Thome
59W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kelly Hollingsworth
38W–39L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Kristin Monge
28W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Laila Yoder
44W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.24
Keri Root
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Pearl Jhala
63W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Amber McGhee
38W–23L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Gina Hovis
33W–40L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
Leslie Lischer
31W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Shannon Thackston
32W–28L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Jodi Pike
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mariya Zhuravleva
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.