Teams

WS - Racket Scientists

2024 Alachua Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.56 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-31vs HCC - FoxLost 02
L#1 DoublesNathan Wycoff / Anita Rajasekhar vs Mara Rodriguez / Enzo Vettorato1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHamidreza Esmaeillou / Kristin Hedtke vs Hebah Fox / Harrison Thibault4-6, 4-6
2024-07-26vs 300-PaulyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristin Hedtke / Don Monk vs Faun Carlson / Rupen Shah7-5, 6-1
2024-07-23vs JTC - ZaldivarLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristin Hedtke / Ehsan Amini vs Lucy Kaul / Kirit Samayam6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTimothy Ferguson / Lisa Booth vs Jorg Bungert / Jigisha Shah3-6, 4-6
2024-07-21vs Alachua/Justis/18&OverMxdLost 01
L#2 DoublesDerek Farnsworth / Judith Bertran vs Andrew Diaz / Linda Garcia-Crespo0-6, 0-6
2024-07-11vs JTC - LancasterWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnita Rajasekhar / Scott Wright vs Rachael Seidler / Chihong Yun6-3, 6-3
2024-06-23vs JTC - SorinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristin Hedtke / Don Monk vs Diana Leyva / Nikky Leyva6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJudith Bertran / Timothy Ferguson vs Megan Ryals / Kevin Smith3-6, 1-6
2024-06-14vs JTC - TaylorWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Hedtke / Hamidreza Esmaeillou vs Cassie Johnson / Thomas Duffaut6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Alyssa Ray
published 4
3.75
Anita Rajasekhar
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.71
Kristin Hedtke
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.53
Kim Magee
published
3.50
Judith Bertran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Don Monk
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Scott Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Booth
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.05
Derek Farnsworth
published 3
Timothy Ferguson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Don Monk + Lisa Booth314 matchesnot enough data
Scott Wright + Anita Rajasekhar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alyssa Ray
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Anita Rajasekhar
130W–74L career · 11 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Kristin Hedtke
38W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.71
Kim Magee
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Judith Bertran
181W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Don Monk
138W–62L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Scott Wright
96W–110L career · 1 line in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Lisa Booth
168W–85L career · 9 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Derek Farnsworth
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Timothy Ferguson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.