Teams

Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Lori Brown)

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-01-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesGail Larkin vs Jan Hardwick6-0, 6-1
2023-01-07vs Flowers Crossing (Lisa Slaton)*Won 10
W#1 SinglesGail Larkin vs Lynnessa Snodgrass3-6, 6-3, 6-1
2022-12-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesGail Larkin vs Alycia Parker7-5, 6-3
2022-12-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesGail Larkin vs Susan Chu6-0, 6-3
2022-12-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesGail Larkin vs Elyse Sharfman6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Lori Brown) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Allison Ellison
published 4
3.72
Cherrie Broome
published 4
3.62
Susan Bracken
published
3.61
Yvette Temate
published
3.56
Lauralee Burke
published
3.54
Tomeka Blackmon
published
3.50
Susette Hall
published
3.43
Gail Larkin
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.33
Bonnie Ferguson
published 3.5
3.30
Faye McCorkle
published
2.88
Deborah Hammond
published 3
Gretchen Hughes
published
Laura Holder
published
Marie Hartley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susette Hall + Lauralee Burke10949% games−6.0% vs expected
Faye McCorkle + Lauralee Burke1438% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Ferguson + Faye McCorkle044 matchesnot enough data
Tomeka Blackmon + Allison Ellison033 matchesnot enough data
Cherrie Broome + Allison Ellison303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Ellison
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Cherrie Broome
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Susan Bracken
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
Yvette Temate
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lauralee Burke
21W–24L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Tomeka Blackmon
1W–20L career · no lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
3.54
Susette Hall
23W–40L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Gail Larkin
24W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Bonnie Ferguson
36W–50L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
Faye McCorkle
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.30
3
Deborah Hammond
33W–48L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.88
Gretchen Hughes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Holder
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marie Hartley
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.