Teams

10 Avalon Belding

2021 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Men 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrad Williamson / David McKelvey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-08vs 6 Westwood RacelisLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Bland / Brad Williamson vs George Brickley / Mark Reams4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesRichard Bland / Jesse Pasco vs Paul Haley / THOMAS HONG2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-11vs 9 ACAC WilsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJesse Pasco / Richard Bland vs Randy Koch / John Johnston6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrad Williamson / David McKelvey vs Jonathan Meade / Mark Carter6-1, 7-5
2021-06-27vs 7 James River Stephens Surge 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Williamson / Richard Bland vs Greg Deeb / Tom Rider6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-24vs 5 Woodlake McCoy Triple FaultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Bland / Jesse Pasco vs Dave McCoy / Brian Elliott6-4, 6-4
2021-06-13vs 3 Avalon Calhoun 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Bland / Doug Rechenbach vs John French / Glenn Mizrach6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jesse Pasco
published
3.40
Brent Belding
published 3.5
3.34
Todd Mungo
published
3.33
Brad Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Richard Bland
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Tim Dolan
published
3.17
Vikram Nagulan
published
3.16
Gregory Blouch
published 3.5
2.83
David McKelvey
published 3
2.65
Doug Rechenbach
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Williamson + Richard Bland241253% games+0.8% vs expected
David McKelvey + Doug Rechenbach123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesse Pasco
22W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Brent Belding
15W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
Todd Mungo
16W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Brad Williamson
176W–167L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Richard Bland
251W–138L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Tim Dolan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Vikram Nagulan
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Gregory Blouch
8W–32L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
David McKelvey
16W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Doug Rechenbach
2W–20L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.