Teams

LCTA18/Sullivan-ZANG/LTPDI

Other 18 & Over Singles League · Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-27vs LCTA18/Beiko/MPRWon 10
W#1 SinglesPaula Hagopian vs Jana Upshaw6-1, 6-1
2026-06-20vs LCTA18/Goddard/MaybankWon 30
W#1 SinglesNicole Melton vs Elaina Cole1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSandra To vs Katy Hanna6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAnnmarie Taggio vs Lindsay Eddy6-3, 6-0
2026-06-06vs LCTA18/Beiko/MPRLost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Messerly vs Stephanie Leahy1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKiana Thatcher vs Daina Hill4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJackie Cooper vs Tatsiana Beiko6-2, 6-3
2026-05-30vs LCTA18/Goddard/MaybankWon 30
W#1 SinglesPaula Hagopian vs Lizzie Goddard7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNicole Melton vs Katy Hanna6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSandra To vs Sara Christopher6-4, 6-3
2026-05-09vs LCTA18/Beiko/MPRWon 21
L#1 SinglesKiana Thatcher vs Rachel Kohler3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSandra To vs Daina Hill6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJennifer Messerly vs Tatsiana Beiko6-1, 6-2
2026-05-03vs LCTA18/Goddard/MaybankLost 12
L#1 SinglesSandra To vs Lizzie Goddard4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesWendy Mercado vs Taylor Kent6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesSuzie Zhang vs Catherine MacKelcan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Sullivan-ZANG/LTPDI4212614129
2LCTA18/Beiko/MPR2461224172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jackie Cooper
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.85
Nicole Melton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.79
Paula Hagopian
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.78
Kiana Thatcher
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.77
Sandra To
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.72
Annmarie Taggio
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Wendy Mercado
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.53
Suzie Zhang
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.46
Jennifer Messerly
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Patricia Schuster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Melton + Jennifer Messerly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jackie Cooper
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
Nicole Melton
91W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Paula Hagopian
30W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Kiana Thatcher
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Sandra To
125W–127L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Annmarie Taggio
77W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
Wendy Mercado
34W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
Suzie Zhang
61W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Jennifer Messerly
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Patricia Schuster
14W–52L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.