Teams

Team Bakst

2021 55&Over Women · 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-05vs Pink PantherWon 20
W#1 DoublesCheryl Outlaw / Christine Rafizadeh vs Eileen Fay / Lori Koch7-5, 5-4
W#2 DoublesMary Keresey / Liz Benne vs Patricia Bondarenko / Joni Freedman7-5, 6-1
2021-07-22vs Serves and ReturnsWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Rafizadeh / Cheryl Outlaw vs Kimberly Ajavananda / Praxedes Molina6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-07-15vs Pink PantherWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Rafizadeh / Mary Keresey vs Celeste Caparulo / Nobuko Okabe2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-07-08vs Pain in the AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Leibowitz / Joan Bakst vs Sheila Deguines / Juanita Tam0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Outlaw / Louise Arkel vs Maribel Unanue / Amy Wohl2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnita Blomberg / Christine Rafizadeh vs Sandra Cassidy / Carol Conroy0-6, 1-6
2021-07-01vs Pain in the AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Leibowitz / Louise Arkel vs Tracy Jones-Henry / Diane van Dongen4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Ferguson / Mary Keresey vs Deb Murawski / Siobhan Kirk2-6, 3-6
2021-06-24vs Pink PantherLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Rudgers / Cindy Ferguson vs M Grant-Ford / Eileen Fay3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pain in the Aces60171370
2Team Bakst2481024183
3Pink Panther1521633199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Louise Arkel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Amy Leibowitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cindy Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Nancy Rudgers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Christine Rafizadeh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Joan Bakst
published
Mary Keresey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Rudgers + Christine Rafizadeh3738% games−13.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Louise Arkel
128W–102L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Amy Leibowitz
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Ferguson
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Rudgers
33W–54L career · 1 line in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Christine Rafizadeh
28W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
Joan Bakst
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Keresey
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.